* Gilles Dartiguelongue [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Le lundi 30 juin 2008 à 19:01 +0200, Enrico Weigelt a écrit :
big_snip
Funny, how you all manage to make simple things complicated ;-o
I guess nobody considered an trivial solutions like an useflag ...
no, this is not the proper
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 2:47 PM, Enrico Weigelt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, some of you might still remember what I said about gtk and
slots long time ago. Just to summarize my point:
* the use of slots should be MINIMIZED. IMHO, the kernel is one
of the few valid uses, gtk is NOT (1.*
big_snip
Funny, how you all manage to make simple things complicated ;-o
I guess nobody considered an trivial solutions like an useflag ...
cu
--
-
Enrico Weigelt== metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/
Le lundi 30 juin 2008 à 19:01 +0200, Enrico Weigelt a écrit :
big_snip
Funny, how you all manage to make simple things complicated ;-o
I guess nobody considered an trivial solutions like an useflag ...
no, this is not the proper solution. Just consider how bad gtk/gtk2
useflag was and that
Bernd Steinhauser wrote:
Tiziano Müller schrieb:
Bernd Steinhauser wrote:
Tiziano Müller schrieb:
Hi everyone
I'd like to bring bug #229521 to your attention and see whether we can
come up with a solution for it.
The problem:
A package foo depends on a slotted package bar _and_ more
Tiziano Müller schrieb:
Bernd Steinhauser wrote:
Tiziano Müller schrieb:
Bernd Steinhauser wrote:
Tiziano Müller schrieb:
Hi everyone
I'd like to bring bug #229521 to your attention and see whether we can
come up with a solution for it.
The problem:
A package foo depends on a slotted
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 19:57:11 +0200
Tiziano Müller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I miss two things here:
a) What happens in case of DEPEND=, RDEPEND==cat/bar-2:= ? Is
that defined? If yes, what does it mean? If not, what shall be the
package managers behaviour?
:= only
On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 23:41:17 +0200
Tiziano Müller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:= only makes sense when something is both a DEPEND and an RDEPEND.
Actual behaviour, for Paludis, is that it rewrites := deps to :=blah
when writing to VDB any time it can, and leaves anything it can't
as := deps.
