Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
2008/4/20 Peter Weller [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sun, 2008-04-20 at 18:32 +0300, Ali Polatel wrote:
Alon Bar-Lev yazm??:
I suggest gnome-something as it is gnome feature.
How about gnome-keyring? :)
Why? All the ebuilds currently using the 'keyring' use flag are
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Tiziano Müller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd say we should convert it to a global use flag now with a good
description and change it to gnome-keyring later in case we really have a
package which needs 'keyring' for something else.
If we know there may be a
On Sun, 2008-04-20 at 18:06 +0200, Tiziano Müller wrote:
Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
2008/4/20 Peter Weller [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sun, 2008-04-20 at 18:32 +0300, Ali Polatel wrote:
Alon Bar-Lev yazm??:
I suggest gnome-something as it is gnome feature.
How about gnome-keyring? :)
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 6:17 PM, Peter Weller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2008-04-20 at 18:06 +0200, Tiziano Müller wrote:
I'd say we should convert it to a global use flag now with a good
description and change it to gnome-keyring later in case we really have a
package which
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
| If we know there may be a future problem, why make the next *VALID*
| addition perform extra work?
I think the reasoning is that whilst there may be a future problem,
there currently isn't. If it gets changed to gnome-keyring,
On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 18:06:07 +0200
Tiziano Müller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd say we should convert it to a global use flag now with a good
description and change it to gnome-keyring later in case we really
have a package which needs 'keyring' for something else.
Needless to say it would
