Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: [RFC] What features should be included in EAPI 2?

2008-09-01 Thread Peter Volkov
В Чтв, 21/08/2008 в 19:26 -0700, Alec Warner пишет: > src_prepare is a logically distinct action (maybe if we called it > src_patch it would be clearer?) We are not only patching sources there but modify them by other means too (like sed or find .. rm \{\};). So src_prepare is the name which bette

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: [RFC] What features should be included in EAPI 2?

2008-08-21 Thread Alec Warner
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 8:35 AM, Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > >> On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 21:27:03 +0100 >> Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> > On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 23:31:17 +0530 >>> > Arun Raghavan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >> Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >>>

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: [RFC] What features should be included in EAPI 2?

2008-08-21 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 16:35:18 +0100 Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hmm fun as it isn't playing these games with you.. What? Deliberately arguing against an idea because it comes from the wrong people, even though they're the only ones with the practical experience on the issue? > > Any re

[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: [RFC] What features should be included in EAPI 2?

2008-08-21 Thread Steve Long
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 21:27:03 +0100 > Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 23:31:17 +0530 >> > Arun Raghavan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >> >> > The benefit is that it's a logically separate action, and will >> >> > avoi