Fernando J. Pereda wrote:
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 10:33:22AM +0100, Steve Long wrote:
Here you go (this is on an old machine, so you'll get much quicker times
if you try this at home):
A big gain in the context of ebuilds and source packages. Well done.
Yes, almost as important as not
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 20:28:43 +0100
Steve Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fernando J. Pereda wrote:
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 10:33:22AM +0100, Steve Long wrote:
Here you go (this is on an old machine, so you'll get much quicker
times if you try this at home):
A big gain in the context of
David Leverton wrote:
On Wednesday 15 October 2008 10:33:22 Steve Long wrote:
Here you go (this is on an old machine, so you'll get much quicker times
if you try this at home):
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ echo $(run)
#!/bin/bash
P='some-crap/god-i-hate-asshats'
I do hope that that isn't
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 20:51:32 +0100
Steve Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So that's what, on the order of 20 microseconds faster for each
iteration?
Or ~18%. (You shouldn't use the first iteration in general, btw.)
18% of nothing is nothing.
perhaps you're just feeling defensive about your
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 08:51:32PM +0100, Ranjit Singh wrote:
This is a purely stylistic issue, same as the braces with variable
expansions.
See my other posts.
Your other posts only show that this is, indeed, a personal stylistic
issue. And a pointless one, too.
- ferdy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Long wrote:
[...]
for ((i=0;i10;i++)); do echo /usr/share/doc/${P}/examples
/dev/null;
real 11.25
real 9.24
So that's what, on the order of 20 microseconds faster for each iteration?
Or ~18%. (You shouldn't use the first iteration in
