On Saturday 04 March 2006 13:18, MIkey wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Sat, 04 Mar 2006 12:04:11 -0600 MIkey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > | At my job we aim to eventually rid ourselves completely of MS
> > | products on several thousand (local and remote) desktops and replace
> > | them wi
On Sun, 2006-03-05 at 14:16 +0100, Patrick Börjesson wrote:
[snip]
> It seems that INSTALL_MASK works only at merge time, so that if you
> build a package at one machine (with INSTALL_MASK set to f.ex.
> /usr/share/doc) and install it on the same machine, you get the expected
> behaviour. But the
On 2006-03-04 20:47, Ferris McCormick uttered these thoughts:
> On Sat, 4 Mar 2006, MIkey wrote:
>
> > Ferris McCormick wrote:
> >
> >> I misinterpreted what you wrote. I thought you meant "physically included
> >> in the package," not "installed from a binary package." I just completely
> >> re
On Sat, 04 Mar 2006 23:04:22 +0100,
Simon Stelling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote:
> > post_src_install() { rm -rf ${D}usr/share/doc ; }
> > This way, files will be deleted for real, before getting merged or
> > added to your binary package.
>
> No, that function
Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote:
> post_src_install() { rm -rf ${D}usr/share/doc ; }
> This way, files will be deleted for real, before getting merged or
> added to your binary package.
No, that function never gets executed with binary packages. You probably meant
post_pkg_preinst.
--
Kind R
On Sat, 04 Mar 2006 12:18:22 -0600,
MIkey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can it exclude things from being included in binary packages?
AFAIK, no. But what you could use (with portage-2.1) is a hook
function in /etc/portage/bashrc:
post_src_install() { rm -rf ${D}usr/share/doc ; }
This way, fil
MIkey posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted
below, on Sat, 04 Mar 2006 12:18:22 -0600:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 04 Mar 2006 12:04:11 -0600 MIkey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> | At my job we aim to eventually rid ourselves completely of MS
>> | products on several thousand (local and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 4 Mar 2006, MIkey wrote:
Ferris McCormick wrote:
I misinterpreted what you wrote. I thought you meant "physically included
in the package," not "installed from a binary package." I just completely
read what looks like a reasonable reques
Ferris McCormick wrote:
> I misinterpreted what you wrote. I thought you meant "physically included
> in the package," not "installed from a binary package." I just completely
> read what looks like a reasonable request and turned it into nonsense
> without thinking about it, I guess.
I am not
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 04 Mar 2006 12:04:11 -0600 MIkey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | At my job we aim to eventually rid ourselves completely of MS
> | products on several thousand (local and remote) desktops and replace
> | them with some sort of thin linux client running the citrix me
10 matches
Mail list logo
