On Sunday 27 November 2005 22:01, Ivan Yosifov wrote:
What is this debugedit thing for us non-devs ? IMO portage should have
some way to keep the sources around for debugging, for the patch you
are proposing to be fully useful.
It allows some hacks on the debug info. For example the debug
On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 13:20 -0600, R Hill wrote:
Ned Ludd wrote:
Good afternoon,
probably in portage-2.0.54 a patch will be added to emit split debug
info. Having a split debug allows us to retain all the advantages of
stripping executables while gaining the ability to properly debug
On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 07:24 -0500, Ned Ludd wrote:
On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 13:20 -0600, R Hill wrote:
Ned Ludd wrote:
Good afternoon,
probably in portage-2.0.54 a patch will be added to emit split debug
info. Having a split debug allows us to retain all the advantages of
stripping
On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 15:09 +0200, Ivan Yosifov wrote:
On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 07:24 -0500, Ned Ludd wrote:
On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 13:20 -0600, R Hill wrote:
Ned Ludd wrote:
Good afternoon,
probably in portage-2.0.54 a patch will be added to emit split debug
info. Having a
On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 15:09 +0200, Ivan Yosifov wrote:
On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 07:24 -0500, Ned Ludd wrote:
On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 13:20 -0600, R Hill wrote:
Ned Ludd wrote:
Good afternoon,
probably in portage-2.0.54 a patch will be added to emit split debug
info. Having a
On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 08:40 -0500, Ned Ludd wrote:
On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 15:09 +0200, Ivan Yosifov wrote:
And one more thing. For proper debugging, don't I need the source to be
present ?
-g3 -ggdb embeds the source code in the debug info so I don't see the
point.
It doesn't; at least
On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 15:22 +, Edward Catmur wrote:
On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 08:40 -0500, Ned Ludd wrote:
On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 15:09 +0200, Ivan Yosifov wrote:
And one more thing. For proper debugging, don't I need the source to be
present ?
-g3 -ggdb embeds the source code in the
On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 10:44 -0500, Ned Ludd wrote:
On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 15:22 +, Edward Catmur wrote:
On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 08:40 -0500, Ned Ludd wrote:
On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 15:09 +0200, Ivan Yosifov wrote:
And one more thing. For proper debugging, don't I need the source to be
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I really can't give an accurate example. Halcyon who has been testing it
merged world and he was yeilded with 18M of debug info (I have no idea
how many packages he has).
Just for the sake of reference, this was with 95 packages and CFLAGS=-O2
-march=pentium4
On Sun, 2005-27-11 at 13:03 -0500, Mark Loeser wrote:
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I really can't give an accurate example. Halcyon who has been testing it
merged world and he was yeilded with 18M of debug info (I have no idea
how many packages he has).
Just for the sake of
On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 11:55 -0500, Ned Ludd wrote:
On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 10:44 -0500, Ned Ludd wrote:
On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 15:22 +, Edward Catmur wrote:
On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 08:40 -0500, Ned Ludd wrote:
On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 15:09 +0200, Ivan Yosifov wrote:
And one more thing.
On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 23:01 +0200, Ivan Yosifov wrote:
On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 11:55 -0500, Ned Ludd wrote:
On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 10:44 -0500, Ned Ludd wrote:
On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 15:22 +, Edward Catmur wrote:
On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 08:40 -0500, Ned Ludd wrote:
On Sun, 2005-11-27
12 matches
Mail list logo
