Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Suggested default LDFLAGS+=-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common

2008-07-10 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2008-07-10 05:47:28 Ryan Hill napisał(a): On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 21:15:32 +0200 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2008-07-09 15:45:15 Doug Goldstein napisał(a): Luca Barbato wrote: Fabian Groffen wrote: On 30-06-2008 17:35:08 +0200, Arfrever Frehtes

[gentoo-dev] Re: Suggested default LDFLAGS+=-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common

2008-07-09 Thread Ryan Hill
On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 21:15:32 +0200 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2008-07-09 15:45:15 Doug Goldstein napisał(a): Luca Barbato wrote: Fabian Groffen wrote: On 30-06-2008 17:35:08 +0200, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: How can you easily revert

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Suggested default LDFLAGS+=-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common

2008-07-01 Thread Michael Haubenwallner
On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 14:10 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote: On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 21:42:49 +0300 Petteri Räty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mike Frysinger kirjoitti: imo -Wl,-O1 should go into base -mike So seems like we should just do it (tm). Why not default/linux? Just wanted to ask the

[gentoo-dev] Re: Suggested default LDFLAGS+=-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common

2008-07-01 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
Here's the updated version of my proposition: default/linux: LDFLAGS=-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common default/linux/mips: LDFLAGS=-Wl,-O1,--sort-common hardened/linux: LDFLAGS=-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common uclibc: LDFLAGS=-Wl,-O1,--sort-common -- Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar

[gentoo-dev] Re: Suggested default LDFLAGS+=-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common

2008-06-30 Thread Ryan Hill
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 21:42:49 +0300 Petteri Räty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mike Frysinger kirjoitti: On Saturday 28 June 2008, Petteri Räty wrote: Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis kirjoitti: I would like to suggest that default LDFLAGS in Gentoo contain the following flags:

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Suggested default LDFLAGS+=-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common

2008-06-29 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 24 June 2008, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: Fabian Groffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: as long as it doesn't go in /base, but in the linux/freebsd profiles instead, it's fine with me. --has-style=gnu should not be used on non-GLIBC systems (I'm unsure about uclibc, but I'd be

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Suggested default LDFLAGS+=-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common

2008-06-25 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2008-06-25 06:16 Ryan Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisał(a): On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 14:17:48 +0200 Fabian Groffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 24-06-2008 14:15:10 +0200, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: I would like to suggest that default LDFLAGS in Gentoo contain the following flags:

[gentoo-dev] Re: Suggested default LDFLAGS+=-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common

2008-06-24 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
Fabian Groffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: as long as it doesn't go in /base, but in the linux/freebsd profiles instead, it's fine with me. --has-style=gnu should not be used on non-GLIBC systems (I'm unsure about uclibc, but I'd be surprised if they do implement the GNU style hash). -- Diego

[gentoo-dev] Re: Suggested default LDFLAGS+=-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common

2008-06-24 Thread Ryan Hill
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 14:17:48 +0200 Fabian Groffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 24-06-2008 14:15:10 +0200, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: I would like to suggest that default LDFLAGS in Gentoo contain the following flags: -Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common. -O1 enables