Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Suggestion: INVALID - NOCHANGE in bugzilla

2007-03-26 Thread Paul de Vrieze
On Sunday 25 March 2007, »Q« wrote: Kevin F. Quinn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Closing INVALID is like saying they never had an issue - when clearly they did have an issue, even if it was just an issue of understanding. If bugs.gentoo.org users think that it's like saying there's no issue,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Suggestion: INVALID - NOCHANGE in bugzilla

2007-03-25 Thread Jakub Moc
Mike Frysinger napsal(a): On Saturday 24 March 2007, Caleb Cushing wrote: could bugzilla be changed so that the default search includes bugs in all status. instead of just open bugs. I know sometimes I'll miss closed bugs because I'll forget to do an advanced search. there is an open

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Suggestion: INVALID - NOCHANGE in bugzilla

2007-03-25 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 25 March 2007, Jakub Moc wrote: Hmmm, I'm not sure how much of an regression this is. AFAICT bugzilla always required to prefix the search with ALL if you want to search for resolved bugs as well. There's even a note about this directly on the homepage, below the search box. :)

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Suggestion: INVALID - NOCHANGE in bugzilla

2007-03-25 Thread Stephen Bennett
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 15:27:11 + (UTC) Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Invalid (to me) implies a judgement of the work of the submitter, while NOTABUG (to me) implies more a simple variance of opinion, recognizing the other viewpoint as possibly valid (not invalid), but simply choosing a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Suggestion: INVALID - NOCHANGE in bugzilla

2007-03-25 Thread Marius Mauch
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 15:27:11 + (UTC) Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What do others think of NULL or VOID vs. NOTABUG vs. INVALID? I'd object against NULL or VOID, they don't make much sense to me. NOTABUG seems to be the best fit as it's very specific and doesn't leave much room for

[gentoo-dev] Re: Suggestion: INVALID - NOCHANGE in bugzilla

2007-03-25 Thread Steve Long
Duncan wrote: As one who was offended when one of my first bugs got INVALIDated... I know the feeling, mate :) NOTABUG would have been better. It may suffer some of the same issues, but is better, and at least here, wouldn't have the discouraging connotations due to the minor variation in

[gentoo-dev] Re: Suggestion: INVALID - NOCHANGE in bugzilla

2007-03-24 Thread Ryan Hill
Marius Mauch wrote: Kevin F. Quinn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Arguably no bug is invalid in the normal sense - if someone raises an issue, they have an issue, regardless what we think of it. To that end I'd like to propose bugzilla be reconfigured to use the phrase NOCHANGE instead of

[gentoo-dev] Re: Suggestion: INVALID - NOCHANGE in bugzilla

2007-03-24 Thread »Q«
Kevin F. Quinn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Closing INVALID is like saying they never had an issue - when clearly they did have an issue, even if it was just an issue of understanding. If bugs.gentoo.org users think that it's like saying there's no issue, ISTM the problem is with their

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Suggestion: INVALID - NOCHANGE in bugzilla

2007-03-24 Thread Caleb Cushing
a semi on topic thought. could bugzilla be changed so that the default search includes bugs in all status. instead of just open bugs. I know sometimes I'll miss closed bugs because I'll forget to do an advanced search. -- Caleb Cushing

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Suggestion: INVALID - NOCHANGE in bugzilla

2007-03-24 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Saturday 24 March 2007, Caleb Cushing wrote: could bugzilla be changed so that the default search includes bugs in all status. instead of just open bugs. I know sometimes I'll miss closed bugs because I'll forget to do an advanced search. there is an open regression bug about this -mike