On Sun, 03 Sep 2006 17:54:33 -0600
Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
> > If you don't care whether a package is stable or not, just let the
> > arch team go ahead and do what they need to do to stabilise when
> > they wish to. The role of package maintainer has nothing
Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
If you don't care whether a package is stable or not, just let the arch
team go ahead and do what they need to do to stabilise when they wish
to. The role of package maintainer has nothing to do with
stabilisation, which is the preserve of the arch teams.
Um, sure it does
On Sunday 03 September 2006 13:57, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
> Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
> > I don't think it's a good idea for devs to be putting stuff into the
> > tree without taking responsibility for it.
>
> sure I can put myself in there but it will help no one because I cannot
> test the thing. Fu
On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 01:57:10PM +0200, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
> Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
> > I don't think it's a good idea for devs to be putting stuff into the
> > tree without taking responsibility for it.
> sure I can put myself in there but it will help no one because I cannot test
> the th
On Sun, 03 Sep 2006 13:57:10 +0200
Stefan Schweizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
> > I don't think it's a good idea for devs to be putting stuff into the
> > tree without taking responsibility for it.
> sure I can put myself in there but it will help no one because I
> cann
Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
> I don't think it's a good idea for devs to be putting stuff into the
> tree without taking responsibility for it.
sure I can put myself in there but it will help no one because I cannot test
the thing. Furthermore I am actually part of maintainer-needed and commit
fixes th
