Re: [gentoo-dev] A feedback about the CI bug reporting system

2020-11-09 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
On lunedì 9 novembre 2020 13:13:19 CET Marek Szuba wrote: > I think this might be the case of a "silent majority, vocal minority" > scenario. For the record: I for one have found your tinderbox bugs very > useful, not in the least because you test unusual configurations my own > build testing does

Re: [gentoo-dev] A feedback about the CI bug reporting system

2020-11-09 Thread Marek Szuba
On 2020-11-07 12:30, Agostino Sarubbo wrote: What looks strange is that ci/tinderbox opened ~4700 bugs, sure, there are invalid/duplicate bugs but the majority are fixed so in my opinion they were useful, but looking at the mailing list feedback looks to be a completely crap. I think this

Re: [gentoo-dev] A feedback about the CI bug reporting system

2020-11-07 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
Hello Thomas, On sabato 7 novembre 2020 17:06:56 CET Thomas Deutschmann wrote: > I have to second what other already said. > > Dropping bugs and forcing maintainer to review and spend time to check > if there is a problem and what was the reported problem at all creates > more work. And I

Re: [gentoo-dev] A feedback about the CI bug reporting system

2020-11-07 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
Hi, On 2020-11-07 12:30, Agostino Sarubbo wrote: On venerdì 6 novembre 2020 08:21:39 CET Agostino Sarubbo wrote: Hello all, 6 months have been passed after the CI system started to file bug reports. ~ 4700 bugs have been submitted We _know_ that atm is not possible to set a specific summary,

Re: [gentoo-dev] A feedback about the CI bug reporting system

2020-11-07 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
On venerdì 6 novembre 2020 08:21:39 CET Agostino Sarubbo wrote: > Hello all, > > 6 months have been passed after the CI system started to file bug reports. > ~ 4700 bugs have been submitted > > We _know_ that atm is not possible to set a specific summary, instead a > generic summary is used in

Re: [gentoo-dev] A feedback about the CI bug reporting system

2020-11-07 Thread Andreas K . Hüttel
Am Samstag, 7. November 2020, 10:26:27 EET schrieb Agostino Sarubbo: > On sabato 7 novembre 2020 07:15:31 CET Robin H. Johnson wrote: > > Can you please tell us what you need to let others contribute to > > improving the quality of the reports from your CI system? > > Hello Robin, > > I don't

Re: [gentoo-dev] A feedback about the CI bug reporting system

2020-11-07 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
IN REPLY to Aaron Bauman that didn't keep me CC'ed as requested: >Is this coming from the same individual who would complain when security >bugs were not filled out properly in the summary? So, take a dose of >your own medicine here. People prefer usable reports that allow them to >solve

Re: [gentoo-dev] A feedback about the CI bug reporting system

2020-11-07 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
On sabato 7 novembre 2020 07:15:31 CET Robin H. Johnson wrote: > Can you please tell us what you need to let others contribute to > improving the quality of the reports from your CI system? Hello Robin, I don't understand why in general people focus on what is missing into a simple script that

Re: [gentoo-dev] A feedback about the CI bug reporting system

2020-11-06 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 08:21:39AM +0100, Agostino Sarubbo wrote: > Hello all, > > 6 months have been passed after the CI system started to file bug reports. > ~ 4700 bugs have been submitted > > We _know_ that atm is not possible to set a specific summary, instead a > generic summary is used

Re: [gentoo-dev] A feedback about the CI bug reporting system

2020-11-06 Thread Aaron Bauman
On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 10:14:30AM +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > On Fri, 2020-11-06 at 08:21 +0100, Agostino Sarubbo wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > 6 months have been passed after the CI system started to file bug reports. > > ~ 4700 bugs have been submitted > > > > We _know_ that atm is not

Re: [gentoo-dev] A feedback about the CI bug reporting system

2020-11-06 Thread Aaron Bauman
On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 09:39:35AM +0100, Agostino Sarubbo wrote: > On venerdì 6 novembre 2020 09:18:50 CET Joonas Niilola wrote: > > Would it be possible for "someone" to figure it out, if you made your > > tinderbox scripts/code public? ;) Hate to say it, but toralf does pretty > > good job

Re: [gentoo-dev] A feedback about the CI bug reporting system

2020-11-06 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
IN REPLY TO Michał Górny that didn't keep me CC'ed as requested: >I do disagree with your presumption that this needs to be automated. >The whole point behind providing a service is that you should be ready >to dedicate *your* time into the service. However, we keep feeling that >you assume that

Re: [gentoo-dev] A feedback about the CI bug reporting system

2020-11-06 Thread Michał Górny
On Fri, 2020-11-06 at 08:21 +0100, Agostino Sarubbo wrote: > Hello all, > > 6 months have been passed after the CI system started to file bug reports. > ~ 4700 bugs have been submitted > > We _know_ that atm is not possible to set a specific summary, instead a > generic summary is used in case

Re: [gentoo-dev] A feedback about the CI bug reporting system

2020-11-06 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
On venerdì 6 novembre 2020 09:18:50 CET Joonas Niilola wrote: > Would it be possible for "someone" to figure it out, if you made your > tinderbox scripts/code public? ;) Hate to say it, but toralf does pretty > good job here, so it could be better. As stated multiple times, toralf said that the

Re: [gentoo-dev] A feedback about the CI bug reporting system

2020-11-06 Thread Joonas Niilola
On 11/6/20 9:21 AM, Agostino Sarubbo wrote: > Hello all, > > 6 months have been passed after the CI system started to file bug reports. > ~ 4700 bugs have been submitted > > We _know_ that atm is not possible to set a specific summary, instead a > generic summary is used in case of compile

[gentoo-dev] A feedback about the CI bug reporting system

2020-11-05 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
Hello all, 6 months have been passed after the CI system started to file bug reports. ~ 4700 bugs have been submitted We _know_ that atm is not possible to set a specific summary, instead a generic summary is used in case of compile failures and test failures. There are also some documented