Re: [gentoo-dev] About masking net-misc/mDNSResponder for removal
El lun, 13-02-2012 a las 12:06 +0100, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." escribió: > On 2/13/12 11:55 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > El jue, 09-02-2012 a las 12:41 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: > >> Hello > >> > >> Looks like our net-misc/mDNSResponder packages are orphan and > >> unmaintained for a looong time, they also have some opened bugs (with > >> hangs, build problems...) and looks like avahi with mdns compat can > >> replace it. > >> > >> OK with masking it for removal? If not, is anyone willing to maintain > >> it? > > > > OK to start dropping it from dependencies and mask it for removal? > > Since there was no response to the original e-mail... I second this. > > +1 to remove the mess. > I guess will be safer to drop mDNSResponder deps with a revbump to force people to rebuild them against avahi instead of mDNSResponder, no? signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [gentoo-dev] About masking net-misc/mDNSResponder for removal
El lun, 13-02-2012 a las 16:06 -0600, Dale escribió: > "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > > On 2/13/12 11:55 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > >> El jue, 09-02-2012 a las 12:41 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: > >>> Hello > >>> > >>> Looks like our net-misc/mDNSResponder packages are orphan and > >>> unmaintained for a looong time, they also have some opened bugs (with > >>> hangs, build problems...) and looks like avahi with mdns compat can > >>> replace it. > >>> > >>> OK with masking it for removal? If not, is anyone willing to maintain > >>> it? > >> > >> OK to start dropping it from dependencies and mask it for removal? > > > > Since there was no response to the original e-mail... I second this. > > > > +1 to remove the mess. > > > > > I just noticed this: > > kde-base/kdelibs-4.8.0-r1 (!bindist ? net-misc/mDNSResponder) Then, bindist could be dropped from there as it's only there to allow mDNSResponder usage over avahi. > kde-base/krdc-4.8.0 (zeroconf ? net-misc/mDNSResponder) It depends on: zeroconf? ( || ( net-dns/avahi net-misc/mDNSResponder ) ) > media-libs/libgphoto2-2.4.11-r1 (zeroconf ? net-misc/mDNSResponder) > net-misc/ntp-4.2.6_p4 (zeroconf ? net-misc/mDNSResponder) > The same > > I'm assuming this is not going to break something. > > Dale > > :-) :-) > signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [gentoo-dev] About masking net-misc/mDNSResponder for removal
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > On 2/13/12 11:55 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: >> El jue, 09-02-2012 a las 12:41 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: >>> Hello >>> >>> Looks like our net-misc/mDNSResponder packages are orphan and >>> unmaintained for a looong time, they also have some opened bugs (with >>> hangs, build problems...) and looks like avahi with mdns compat can >>> replace it. >>> >>> OK with masking it for removal? If not, is anyone willing to maintain >>> it? >> >> OK to start dropping it from dependencies and mask it for removal? > > Since there was no response to the original e-mail... I second this. > > +1 to remove the mess. > I just noticed this: kde-base/kdelibs-4.8.0-r1 (!bindist ? net-misc/mDNSResponder) kde-base/krdc-4.8.0 (zeroconf ? net-misc/mDNSResponder) media-libs/libgphoto2-2.4.11-r1 (zeroconf ? net-misc/mDNSResponder) net-misc/ntp-4.2.6_p4 (zeroconf ? net-misc/mDNSResponder) I'm assuming this is not going to break something. Dale :-) :-) -- I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! Miss the compile output? Hint: EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--quiet-build=n"
Re: [gentoo-dev] About masking net-misc/mDNSResponder for removal
On 2/13/12 11:55 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > El jue, 09-02-2012 a las 12:41 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: >> Hello >> >> Looks like our net-misc/mDNSResponder packages are orphan and >> unmaintained for a looong time, they also have some opened bugs (with >> hangs, build problems...) and looks like avahi with mdns compat can >> replace it. >> >> OK with masking it for removal? If not, is anyone willing to maintain >> it? > > OK to start dropping it from dependencies and mask it for removal? Since there was no response to the original e-mail... I second this. +1 to remove the mess. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] About masking net-misc/mDNSResponder for removal
El jue, 09-02-2012 a las 12:41 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: > Hello > > Looks like our net-misc/mDNSResponder packages are orphan and > unmaintained for a looong time, they also have some opened bugs (with > hangs, build problems...) and looks like avahi with mdns compat can > replace it. > > OK with masking it for removal? If not, is anyone willing to maintain > it? OK to start dropping it from dependencies and mask it for removal? signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
[gentoo-dev] About masking net-misc/mDNSResponder for removal
Hello Looks like our net-misc/mDNSResponder packages are orphan and unmaintained for a looong time, they also have some opened bugs (with hangs, build problems...) and looks like avahi with mdns compat can replace it. OK with masking it for removal? If not, is anyone willing to maintain it? signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
