[gentoo-dev] About obsolete/useless devaway messages
Was reviewing http://dev.gentoo.org/devaway/ and I have seen there are a lot of obsolete messages. Could you take a look and verify don't have an old .away file in your homes ;) ? Thanks a lot signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [gentoo-dev] About obsolete/useless devaway messages
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote: Was reviewing http://dev.gentoo.org/devaway/ and I have seen there are a lot of obsolete messages. Could you take a look and verify don't have an old .away file in your homes ;) ? Might not hurt to generally consider the usefulness of .away messages in general. If you have one and it doesn't really convey anything useful, then it might as well not be there. If Gentoo is something you only sporadically work at, and you plan on being that way for years, and you carefully control your responsibilities accordingly, I'm not sure it is necessary to advertise the fact. If you normally have one level of availability, and it is going to be different for some reasonable period of time, then it is useful so that people know what is going on. Useful messages: I'm on vacation until Feb 8th - check with other team members in the meantime. Just started a new job - bear with me while I hand off responsibilities / get back on my feet in a few weeks. Less useful message: My job comes first - will not have much time for Gentoo for the next 30 years but I'll do what I can. If things are changing .away is a great tool. If things are going to impact your level of Gentoo contribution for a long time the best thing to do is to just change your level of involvement to suit. Probably not good to be the project lead for Chromium if you can only look for updates twice a year, and so on. If you maintain three packages and do the odd arch test and your teammates generally know that, no real need to advertise - just watch for bug emails and comment on anything that looks urgent... Rich
Re: [gentoo-dev] About obsolete/useless devaway messages
El sáb, 28-01-2012 a las 10:57 -0500, Rich Freeman escribió: On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote: Was reviewing http://dev.gentoo.org/devaway/ and I have seen there are a lot of obsolete messages. Could you take a look and verify don't have an old .away file in your homes ;) ? Might not hurt to generally consider the usefulness of .away messages in general. If you have one and it doesn't really convey anything useful, then it might as well not be there. If Gentoo is something you only sporadically work at, and you plan on being that way for years, and you carefully control your responsibilities accordingly, I'm not sure it is necessary to advertise the fact. If you normally have one level of availability, and it is going to be different for some reasonable period of time, then it is useful so that people know what is going on. Useful messages: I'm on vacation until Feb 8th - check with other team members in the meantime. Just started a new job - bear with me while I hand off responsibilities / get back on my feet in a few weeks. Less useful message: My job comes first - will not have much time for Gentoo for the next 30 years but I'll do what I can. If things are changing .away is a great tool. If things are going to impact your level of Gentoo contribution for a long time the best thing to do is to just change your level of involvement to suit. Probably not good to be the project lead for Chromium if you can only look for updates twice a year, and so on. If you maintain three packages and do the odd arch test and your teammates generally know that, no real need to advertise - just watch for bug emails and comment on anything that looks urgent... Rich I fully agree, personally, I think we should tend to only have messages informing about an important change in our involvement with Gentoo and the cases when we expect to not be able to commit anything for a few months but will return after that. Also looks important to me that, when going to contribute less on maintainership, people should try to find new maintainers or co-maintainers for their packages if possible (sending a mail to gentoo-dev for example) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [gentoo-dev] About obsolete/useless devaway messages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 01/28/2012 03:57 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote: Was reviewing http://dev.gentoo.org/devaway/ and I have seen there are a lot of obsolete messages. Could you take a look and verify don't have an old .away file in your homes ;) ? Might not hurt to generally consider the usefulness of .away messages in general. If you have one and it doesn't really convey anything useful, then it might as well not be there. If Gentoo is something you only sporadically work at, and you plan on being that way for years, and you carefully control your responsibilities accordingly, I'm not sure it is necessary to advertise the fact. If you normally have one level of availability, and it is going to be different for some reasonable period of time, then it is useful so that people know what is going on. Useful messages: I'm on vacation until Feb 8th - check with other team members in the meantime. Just started a new job - bear with me while I hand off responsibilities / get back on my feet in a few weeks. Less useful message: My job comes first - will not have much time for Gentoo for the next 30 years but I'll do what I can. If things are changing .away is a great tool. If things are going to impact your level of Gentoo contribution for a long time the best thing to do is to just change your level of involvement to suit. Probably not good to be the project lead for Chromium if you can only look for updates twice a year, and so on. If you maintain three packages and do the odd arch test and your teammates generally know that, no real need to advertise - just watch for bug emails and comment on anything that looks urgent... Rich This has been discussed in the paste and the result was this bug report[1]. But these people who have long standing devaways are not participating on our lists therefore these threads ends up in /dev/null. [1]: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338829 - -- Regards, Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJPJFKLAAoJEPqDWhW0r/LCZhsP+gOUH0oHUu/hstJF31Y9uzzQ 6av6w9e8+21tv41h/AuIdjfx0eb7w/6oXT+v6m7oVr0IcyfR+44VVQ146TAfcdCu cjwbmQEP+l/Omx3nic6DfG2RT9NTXsoC9nKSFQ9H3xqg3uKEZXRiwTgh3bnu/lYE tzXgfx7XBy8KBt6Tck+k5AIdJcM+aGvFsGWA0qqPYw9Wcu9CHYoaU7fkZFfVRBhh uNGhre/SYku0GQmi1C+fBnVIP4RJ+W9MY/4urJxgDbPOy2RV/naIH+jFYPBxPL8A 5tDKe9/YeGD/MwFUtc3PXFT66q6CPG3TP5cltyI6VpJKwLdCgln44486fIZQS8Qm KyhmxnVqX6sCeRFC14WeIZwif1w58BEJXHqUCfZrZbjeywCUa9wNgA8u7iLlFKaW ZlBlaoIEkjzowgEtjK5LaxpIPHrlhQGjawFwlAd94/hVDydElCLTamyEQqiEwIIJ UmPtKwYEFYMf9Xzzj9Yi3gMXhYncYFeO9xi1Y9YvjfIBD9kK9ljptZyvOxVPczGM OgnT4FVc/YSTHF7uhPXo7gN0hZiaDBAQaqGWx7DwdkyP7HE6ZNLa5NgTWW051TTc dJVkA0GfF+Ek70Omjl6NCpGA1N6rlK0JgK7qPeTouV1HjtyW9QrDLwdtpveyENNV aM657X0mCeXAqgsHfrPY =gbzw -END PGP SIGNATURE-
