On 8 September 2013 14:00, Mikle Kolyada wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi guys!
>
> Few days ago i was surprised, when i saw perl-5.18 unhardmasked.
> So, i want ask here.
>
>
> @Patrick, why you unmask it? You even not ack perl herd about it. It was
> in the tree about two weeks, too early for unmasking, furthermore, you
> added not all modules need for perl-5.18 in the tree. Now many users ask
> us "why perl 5.18 broke our modules?" Its not good. Testing on three
> boxes w/o problems, no major reason for unmasking. And also, many CPAN
> guys still no fix own modules for compile with-5.18
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iJwEAQECAAYFAlIsdO0ACgkQG9wOWsQutdat/QQAsLcbqEn6NZGFAoipWZuBCxMM
> Q5BPj7a43vLEuI08aCbOeiihVWqEEVqPOWJyXAoSohkOL5DhmRfv1e6z4JPX2BGv
> dH/HFBkFtWH3gVOg7BV+rvecSb/ds6M2zufjnSHfBxomAuSKiFru1lQGYoVbPOrZ
> Gwpy66uY2LZ9kBNkM/Q=
> =USUZ
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>
>
Hi,
If you feel it should not be unmask then please mask it again.
Although it might be too late for that.
Moreover, I don't think raising this issue to the mailing list
is appropriate as a first step. Did you try to talk to him? If you
feel he violated the perl@ team policies please consider
following the QA policy for such violations
https://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0048.html
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
