On Tuesday, February 04, 2014 22:25:00 Jauhien Piatlicki wrote:
04.02.14 20:53, Donnie Berkholz написав(ла):
On 12:48 Tue 28 Jan , Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2014-01-28, o godz. 11:59:33 Jauhien Piatlicki napisał(a):
net-misc/rsync upstream provides a tarball with additional patches that
On 2014-02-05 00:13, Mike Frysinger wrote:
i don't see any patches in rsync-3.1.0. i'd be hesitant to add support for
them even if they were there ...
They're in a different tarball [1], and yes I agree that it would be
best to use epatch_user or similar.
Tim
[1]:
On 12:48 Tue 28 Jan , Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2014-01-28, o godz. 11:59:33
Jauhien Piatlicki jpiatli...@gmail.com napisał(a):
net-misc/rsync upstream provides a tarball with additional patches that
can be useful for some users. I think it would be nice to have them
handled
04.02.14 20:53, Donnie Berkholz написав(ла):
On 12:48 Tue 28 Jan , Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2014-01-28, o godz. 11:59:33
Jauhien Piatlicki jpiatli...@gmail.com napisał(a):
net-misc/rsync upstream provides a tarball with additional patches that
can be useful for some users. I think it
Hi,
net-misc/rsync upstream provides a tarball with additional patches that
can be useful for some users. I think it would be nice to have them
handled automatically by portage using e.g. USE_EXPAND.
Of course these patches can be just picked by user an applied using
epatch_user, but I think it
Dnia 2014-01-28, o godz. 11:59:33
Jauhien Piatlicki jpiatli...@gmail.com napisał(a):
net-misc/rsync upstream provides a tarball with additional patches that
can be useful for some users. I think it would be nice to have them
handled automatically by portage using e.g. USE_EXPAND.
Of course
