Re: [gentoo-dev] Change in mentoring requirements
Petteri Räty wrote: > Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto kirjoitti: >> There's one thing that you're not addressing though. We have different >> types of developers amongst us, so how do we count the 6 months period? >> Let me explain more fully. At this point, I could mentor someone into >> becoming a new moderator in the forums, but I don't think anyone would >> support me being an ebuild dev mentor - not being one myself yet. IIRC, >> documentation devs don't need to be ebuild devs. Does anyone propose >> that I could be a docs dev mentor - not being part of the team? Finally, >> should a 6+ month ebuild dev, recently becoming part of the docs or >> forums moderation team, be allowed to be a mentor for those teams? >> Perhaps we should require that the dev be part of Gentoo for at least >> six months and in the case of mentoring for the forums or the docs team, >> that he/she has the blessing of the team lead(s) - in case the dev isn't >> part of the respective team for at least X months. Do we want X to be 6 >> months? >> Anyone agrees/disagrees? >> >> > > From http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/recruiters/mentor.xml > "In addition, your project lead must be CC'd and must approve the bug > when it's filed to confirm that the project is accepting new developers." > > I doubt the docs team approves you as a mentor. > > Regards, > Petteri > Yes, I wasn't thinking too well yesterday. Just because someone fulfills the requirements to become a mentor, that doesn't mean that he / she can be a mentor for a specific project. Projects can impose additional requirements. Thanks and sorry for wasting people's time. -- Jorge Vicetto (jmbsvicetto) - jmbsvicetto at gentoo dot org Gentoo-forums / Userrel -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] Change in mentoring requirements
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto kirjoitti: > > There's one thing that you're not addressing though. We have different > types of developers amongst us, so how do we count the 6 months period? > Let me explain more fully. At this point, I could mentor someone into > becoming a new moderator in the forums, but I don't think anyone would > support me being an ebuild dev mentor - not being one myself yet. IIRC, > documentation devs don't need to be ebuild devs. Does anyone propose > that I could be a docs dev mentor - not being part of the team? Finally, > should a 6+ month ebuild dev, recently becoming part of the docs or > forums moderation team, be allowed to be a mentor for those teams? > Perhaps we should require that the dev be part of Gentoo for at least > six months and in the case of mentoring for the forums or the docs team, > that he/she has the blessing of the team lead(s) - in case the dev isn't > part of the respective team for at least X months. Do we want X to be 6 > months? > Anyone agrees/disagrees? > > From http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/recruiters/mentor.xml "In addition, your project lead must be CC'd and must approve the bug when it's filed to confirm that the project is accepting new developers." I doubt the docs team approves you as a mentor. Regards, Petteri signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Change in mentoring requirements
On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 22:46:10 + "Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We have different > types of developers amongst us, so how do we count the 6 months > period? Let me explain more fully. At this point, I could mentor > someone into becoming a new moderator in the forums, but I don't > think anyone would support me being an ebuild dev mentor - not being > one myself yet. It's long been the case that individual projects can set additional criteria for recruits joining them -- I don't see why that shouldn't also apply to people mentoring recruits to join that project. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] Change in mentoring requirements
Hi. Petteri Räty wrote: > > Before you can mentor anyone, you must have been with Gentoo for at > least six > -months or must be a project lead. > +months. Previously being a project lead was enough too but with GLEP 39 > anyone > +can create new projects. > > > > > > Regards, > Petteri > -- > Gentoo/Recruiters lead > Gentoo/Java lead > Petteri, I assumed this was already the case and it makes perfect sense to me. There's one thing that you're not addressing though. We have different types of developers amongst us, so how do we count the 6 months period? Let me explain more fully. At this point, I could mentor someone into becoming a new moderator in the forums, but I don't think anyone would support me being an ebuild dev mentor - not being one myself yet. IIRC, documentation devs don't need to be ebuild devs. Does anyone propose that I could be a docs dev mentor - not being part of the team? Finally, should a 6+ month ebuild dev, recently becoming part of the docs or forums moderation team, be allowed to be a mentor for those teams? Perhaps we should require that the dev be part of Gentoo for at least six months and in the case of mentoring for the forums or the docs team, that he/she has the blessing of the team lead(s) - in case the dev isn't part of the respective team for at least X months. Do we want X to be 6 months? Anyone agrees/disagrees? -- Jorge Vicetto (jmbsvicetto) - jmbsvicetto at gentoo dot org Gentoo-forums / Userrel -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
[gentoo-dev] Change in mentoring requirements
Before you can mentor anyone, you must have been with Gentoo for at least six -months or must be a project lead. +months. Previously being a project lead was enough too but with GLEP 39 anyone +can create new projects. Regards, Petteri -- Gentoo/Recruiters lead Gentoo/Java lead signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
