Re: [gentoo-dev] Default USE changes for fortran and mudflap?

2014-01-13 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 01:53 Sun 12 Jan , Ryan Hill wrote: fortran: Do we want to keep enabling fortran by default? The majority of users will never get the urge to install a fortran package, and the fortran eclass handles those that do. I think it should be treated as all the other optional languages

Re: [gentoo-dev] Default USE changes for fortran and mudflap?

2014-01-13 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 12 January 2014 02:53:47 Ryan Hill wrote: While I'm adding USE defaults to toolchain.eclass and moving them out of the profiles, I thought now would be a good time to review a couple default flag settings. mudflap: This is currently enabled by default but I'd like to disable it.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Default USE changes for fortran and mudflap?

2014-01-12 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2014-01-12, o godz. 01:53:47 Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org napisał(a): fortran: Do we want to keep enabling fortran by default? The majority of users will never get the urge to install a fortran package, and the fortran eclass handles those that do. I think it should be treated as

Re: [gentoo-dev] Default USE changes for fortran and mudflap?

2014-01-12 Thread Pacho Ramos
El dom, 12-01-2014 a las 09:24 +0100, Michał Górny escribió: Dnia 2014-01-12, o godz. 01:53:47 Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org napisał(a): fortran: Do we want to keep enabling fortran by default? The majority of users will never get the urge to install a fortran package, and the fortran

Re: [gentoo-dev] Default USE changes for fortran and mudflap?

2014-01-12 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
Am Sonntag, 12. Januar 2014, 08:53:47 schrieb Ryan Hill: fortran: Do we want to keep enabling fortran by default? The majority of users will never get the urge to install a fortran package, and the fortran eclass handles those that do. I think it should be treated as all the other optional

Re: [gentoo-dev] Default USE changes for fortran and mudflap?

2014-01-12 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 01/12/2014 02:53 AM, Ryan Hill wrote: fortran: Do we want to keep enabling fortran by default? The majority of users will never get the urge to install a fortran package, and the fortran eclass handles those that do. I think it should be treated as all the other optional languages and

Re: [gentoo-dev] Default USE changes for fortran and mudflap?

2014-01-12 Thread Matt Turner
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 11:53 PM, Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote: While I'm adding USE defaults to toolchain.eclass and moving them out of the profiles, I thought now would be a good time to review a couple default flag settings. mudflap: This is currently enabled by default but I'd

Re: [gentoo-dev] Default USE changes for fortran and mudflap?

2014-01-12 Thread Matthew Summers
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 1:53 AM, Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote: fortran: Do we want to keep enabling fortran by default? The majority of users will never get the urge to install a fortran package, and the fortran eclass handles those that do. I think it should be treated as all the

[gentoo-dev] Default USE changes for fortran and mudflap?

2014-01-11 Thread Ryan Hill
While I'm adding USE defaults to toolchain.eclass and moving them out of the profiles, I thought now would be a good time to review a couple default flag settings. mudflap: This is currently enabled by default but I'd like to disable it. It controls libmudflap and the -fmudflap flag. I think