Re: [gentoo-dev] Duplicate bug reports, resolution status and Bug 426262

Michael Mol wrote: > 4) Jer marked #530478 as a dupe of #426262, To me that looks bogus. #530478 is about app-office/dia while #426262 is about two eclasses. Jeroen - please explain why you consider 530478 a duplicate of 426262? I note that you did not do so in Bugzilla while marking the dupe, b

[gentoo-dev] Duplicate bug reports, resolution status and Bug 426262

(First, I don't care how the autoconf.in->autoconf.ac migration is handled at a code level. This isn't about that. I'd appreciate if that were largely handled in a separate thread. This (I think) is about policy around bug reporting.) Timeline: 1) *Bug 426262*