Samuli Suominen wrote:
Wed, 16 Apr 2008 12:09:24 -0700
Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] kirjoitti:
On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 11:49 +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
thirty days is the norm for the minimal period between an ebuilds
last
It is the norm. It is not a requirement. In fact, it is
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 15:33:17 +0300
Samuli Suominen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thu, 17 Apr 2008 09:43:59 +0200
Vlastimil Babka [EMAIL PROTECTED] kirjoitti:
Okay. So we can just agree it's better if the maintainer tells his
reasons when opening the bug, to spare the later clarifications?
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 15:33:17 +0300
Samuli Suominen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It works. Do it.
Oh by the way. This isn't directed toward you personally, but I
personally detest this do it attitude. You wouldn't say that to my
face, would you? (Trust me, you would regret it.) :)
JeR
--
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Samuli Suominen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thu, 17 Apr 2008 09:43:59 +0200
Vlastimil Babka [EMAIL PROTECTED] kirjoitti:
Okay. So we can just agree it's better if the maintainer tells his
reasons when opening the bug, to spare the later clarifications?
It
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 09:40:22PM +0200, Santiago M. Mola wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Samuli Suominen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thu, 17 Apr 2008 09:43:59 +0200
Vlastimil Babka [EMAIL PROTECTED] kirjoitti:
Okay. So we can just agree it's better if the maintainer tells his
Jeroen Roovers wrote:
Dear ebuild maintainers,
thirty days is the norm for the minimal period between an ebuilds last
non-keywording change while in the tree and the usual call for
stabilisation. If you cannot find a pressing reason to push
stabilisation forward, then don't ask. In the
On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 11:49 +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
thirty days is the norm for the minimal period between an ebuilds last
It is the norm. It is not a requirement. In fact, it is specifically a
guideline rather than a hard rule. It is up to the maintainer's
discretion when to ask for
Wed, 16 Apr 2008 12:09:24 -0700
Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] kirjoitti:
On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 11:49 +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
thirty days is the norm for the minimal period between an ebuilds
last
It is the norm. It is not a requirement. In fact, it is
specifically a
Dear ebuild maintainers,
thirty days is the norm for the minimal period between an ebuilds last
non-keywording change while in the tree and the usual call for
stabilisation. If you cannot find a pressing reason to push
stabilisation forward, then don't ask. In the last few days I have seen
