On Tuesday 14 August 2012 13:37:25 Alexis Ballier wrote:
it breaks on _pie_ executables, which are not that common if you dont
run hardened.
every Gentoo system has PIEs on it. not many, but some.
file /*bin/* /usr/*bin/* | grep shared.object
(i wonder why cups is building itself as PIE
On 14.08.2012 00:24, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
On 13/08/2012 11:29, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
/usr/lib/pkgname/ is a directory like /usr/libexec/ or even /bin. It
shares absolutely zero things with the arch-specific $libdir ,or lib64/.
Yes I know that FHS allows it. I still think it would
On 14.08.2012 03:24, Olivier Crête wrote:
On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 17:56 -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Alexandre Rostovtsev
tetrom...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 11:14 -0700, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
Beside the fact that these would probably have looked
On 14/08/2012 02:57, Samuli Suominen wrote:
I highly dislike libexec and have been moving stuff over /usr/lib/$pkg/
on daily basis
So instead of discussing this you just decide you don't like the path
and go with your preference?
Honestly I would have preferred for this to go through council
On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:57:13 +0300
Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 14.08.2012 00:24, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
On 13/08/2012 11:29, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
/usr/lib/pkgname/ is a directory like /usr/libexec/ or
even /bin. It shares absolutely zero things with the
On 14.08.2012 16:35, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
On 14/08/2012 02:57, Samuli Suominen wrote:
I highly dislike libexec and have been moving stuff over /usr/lib/$pkg/
on daily basis
So instead of discussing this you just decide you don't like the path
and go with your preference?
Honestly I
On 13.08.2012 19:55, Samuli Suominen wrote:
[ ... ]
I should mention that we have discussed this already,
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364375
Which was a result of long gentoo-dev ML thread, unfortunately my search
foo failed and I couldn't find straight link to it
Why should we
On 14.08.2012 17:05, Michał Górny wrote:
On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:57:13 +0300
Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 14.08.2012 00:24, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
On 13/08/2012 11:29, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
/usr/lib/pkgname/ is a directory like /usr/libexec/ or
even /bin. It shares
On 14.08.2012 17:05, Michał Górny wrote:
On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:57:13 +0300
Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 14.08.2012 00:24, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
On 13/08/2012 11:29, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
/usr/lib/pkgname/ is a directory like /usr/libexec/ or
even /bin. It shares
On 14.08.2012 19:57, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 14.08.2012 16:35, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
On 14/08/2012 02:57, Samuli Suominen wrote:
I highly dislike libexec and have been moving stuff over /usr/lib/$pkg/
on daily basis
So instead of discussing this you just decide you don't like the path
On 14/08/2012 09:57, Samuli Suominen wrote:
Sorry I was vague in that statement, I meant moving to both /usr/lib/
when suitable (and usually the default from upstream lately) and
/usr/lib64/xfce* (Location of .so Xfce plugins)
Xfce had compability code for finding plugins from /usr/libexec
On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 20:03:50 +0300
Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 13.08.2012 19:55, Samuli Suominen wrote:
[ ... ]
I should mention that we have discussed this already,
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364375
Which was a result of long gentoo-dev ML thread,
http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/profiles/targets/developer/make.defaults?r1=1.11r2=1.12
For example (these are all where they belong):
$ file /usr/lib/udisks2/udisksd
/usr/lib/udisks2/udisksd: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1
(SYSV), dynamically linked (uses
On 13/08/2012 09:55, Samuli Suominen wrote:
I propably won't be working on this much, so help would be appericiated
for restoring working multilib-strict check.
Beside the fact that these would probably have looked better in
/usr/libexec — there used to be a whitelist of stuff that can be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/13/2012 12:55 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/profiles/targets/developer/make.defaults?r1=1.11r2=1.12
For example (these are all where they belong):
I know it seems silly but there are
On 13/08/2012 11:29, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
/usr/lib/pkgname/ is a directory like /usr/libexec/ or even /bin. It
shares absolutely zero things with the arch-specific $libdir ,or lib64/.
Yes I know that FHS allows it. I still think it would be cleaner to use
/usr/libexec.
It's the usual
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Alexandre Rostovtsev
tetrom...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 11:14 -0700, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
Beside the fact that these would probably have looked better in
/usr/libexec
See Kay Sievers's comment at
On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 17:56 -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Alexandre Rostovtsev
tetrom...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 11:14 -0700, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
Beside the fact that these would probably have looked better in
/usr/libexec
See Kay
18 matches
Mail list logo
