Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 27 Bump

2009-11-15 Thread Petteri Räty
Doug Goldstein wrote: GLEP 27 [1] seems pretty stagnant and I'm planning on giving it a bit of a refresh and actually implementing it. Now before I do this I'm not in love with the format in tree but I haven't decided on a format exactly in my head. So that being said, I'm sending this out

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 27 Bump

2009-11-15 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 09:25:45AM +0200, Petteri Räty wrote: Doug Goldstein wrote: GLEP 27 [1] seems pretty stagnant and I'm planning on giving it a bit of a refresh and actually implementing it. Now before I do this I'm not in love with the format in tree but I haven't decided on a format

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 27 Bump

2009-11-15 Thread Doug Goldstein
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 7:35 PM, Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 09:25:45AM +0200, Petteri Räty wrote: Doug Goldstein wrote: GLEP 27 [1] seems pretty stagnant and I'm planning on giving it a bit of a refresh and actually implementing it. Now before I do

[gentoo-dev] GLEP 27 Bump

2009-11-14 Thread Doug Goldstein
GLEP 27 [1] seems pretty stagnant and I'm planning on giving it a bit of a refresh and actually implementing it. Now before I do this I'm not in love with the format in tree but I haven't decided on a format exactly in my head. So that being said, I'm sending this out looking for some opinions or