Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo-CI can now filter on maintainers (also verbose output)

2019-07-25 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia July 26, 2019 5:17:31 AM UTC, Georgy Yakovlev  
napisał(a):
>On Thursday, July 25, 2019 7:05:16 AM PDT Michał Górny wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Just a quick bit of news on gentoo-ci.
>> 
>> Firstly, I've implemented support for quiet/verbose reports.  So now
>> the default report seen at [1] is not that huge, and if somebody
>wants
>> all the details at [2].
>> 
>
>This is great! Now I need to RSS-feed it somehow.

That should be just a matter of adding a new jinja template.

>
>btw, there are some BadRestricts warnings for preserve-libs,
>pkgcheck/pkgcore does not support it, but portage does.
>Are you leaving this on intentionally?

I'm enabling everything in pkgcheck except for exp profiles and git checks (for 
performance reasons). Non-verbose reports include everything that does not 
result in huge number of matches.

Radhermit takes care of pkgcore & co. I only deploy CI and write new checks 
sometimes.

>
>trivial patch I did sometime ago
>https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/pkgcore/pkgcheck/pull/75.patch


--
Best regards, 
Michał Górny



Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo-CI can now filter on maintainers (also verbose output)

2019-07-25 Thread Georgy Yakovlev
On Thursday, July 25, 2019 7:05:16 AM PDT Michał Górny wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Just a quick bit of news on gentoo-ci.
> 
> Firstly, I've implemented support for quiet/verbose reports.  So now
> the default report seen at [1] is not that huge, and if somebody wants
> all the details at [2].
> 

This is great! Now I need to RSS-feed it somehow.

btw, there are some BadRestricts warnings for preserve-libs,
pkgcheck/pkgcore does not support it, but portage does.
Are you leaving this on intentionally?

trivial patch I did sometime ago
https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/pkgcore/pkgcheck/pull/75.patch


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo-CI can now filter on maintainers (also verbose output)

2019-07-25 Thread Kent Fredric
On Thu, 25 Jul 2019 16:05:16 +0200
Michał Górny  wrote:

> Thirdly, I've implemented filtering by maintainer.
> 
> To get reports for developer foo, append ';maintainer=foo', e.g.:

Thanks very much :). This will come in *very* handy for me :)


pgp_LVJov6dDk.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[gentoo-dev] Gentoo-CI can now filter on maintainers (also verbose output)

2019-07-25 Thread Michał Górny
Hi,

Just a quick bit of news on gentoo-ci.

Firstly, I've implemented support for quiet/verbose reports.  So now
the default report seen at [1] is not that huge, and if somebody wants
all the details at [2].

Secondly, the reports now explicitly list maintainers for the reported
packages.

Thirdly, I've implemented filtering by maintainer.

To get reports for developer foo, append ';maintainer=foo', e.g.:

https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/output.html;maintainer=foo

For non-devs, you need full e-mail address:

https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/output.html;maintainer=f...@gentoo.org

You can also append ';include-projects' to include packages maintainer
indirectly by a project you're member of:

https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/output.html;maintainer=fo
o;include-projects


[1] https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/output.html
[2] https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/output.verbose.html

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part