Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo-CI can now filter on maintainers (also verbose output)
Dnia July 26, 2019 5:17:31 AM UTC, Georgy Yakovlev napisał(a): >On Thursday, July 25, 2019 7:05:16 AM PDT Michał Górny wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Just a quick bit of news on gentoo-ci. >> >> Firstly, I've implemented support for quiet/verbose reports. So now >> the default report seen at [1] is not that huge, and if somebody >wants >> all the details at [2]. >> > >This is great! Now I need to RSS-feed it somehow. That should be just a matter of adding a new jinja template. > >btw, there are some BadRestricts warnings for preserve-libs, >pkgcheck/pkgcore does not support it, but portage does. >Are you leaving this on intentionally? I'm enabling everything in pkgcheck except for exp profiles and git checks (for performance reasons). Non-verbose reports include everything that does not result in huge number of matches. Radhermit takes care of pkgcore & co. I only deploy CI and write new checks sometimes. > >trivial patch I did sometime ago >https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/pkgcore/pkgcheck/pull/75.patch -- Best regards, Michał Górny
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo-CI can now filter on maintainers (also verbose output)
On Thursday, July 25, 2019 7:05:16 AM PDT Michał Górny wrote: > Hi, > > Just a quick bit of news on gentoo-ci. > > Firstly, I've implemented support for quiet/verbose reports. So now > the default report seen at [1] is not that huge, and if somebody wants > all the details at [2]. > This is great! Now I need to RSS-feed it somehow. btw, there are some BadRestricts warnings for preserve-libs, pkgcheck/pkgcore does not support it, but portage does. Are you leaving this on intentionally? trivial patch I did sometime ago https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/pkgcore/pkgcheck/pull/75.patch signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo-CI can now filter on maintainers (also verbose output)
On Thu, 25 Jul 2019 16:05:16 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > Thirdly, I've implemented filtering by maintainer. > > To get reports for developer foo, append ';maintainer=foo', e.g.: Thanks very much :). This will come in *very* handy for me :) pgp_LVJov6dDk.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[gentoo-dev] Gentoo-CI can now filter on maintainers (also verbose output)
Hi, Just a quick bit of news on gentoo-ci. Firstly, I've implemented support for quiet/verbose reports. So now the default report seen at [1] is not that huge, and if somebody wants all the details at [2]. Secondly, the reports now explicitly list maintainers for the reported packages. Thirdly, I've implemented filtering by maintainer. To get reports for developer foo, append ';maintainer=foo', e.g.: https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/output.html;maintainer=foo For non-devs, you need full e-mail address: https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/output.html;maintainer=f...@gentoo.org You can also append ';include-projects' to include packages maintainer indirectly by a project you're member of: https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/output.html;maintainer=fo o;include-projects [1] https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/output.html [2] https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/output.verbose.html -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
