On 25-11-2009 16:43:32 -0700, Denis Dupeyron wrote:
> > Yes, I agreed coming up with some patch. I admit I haven't yet even
> > looked into it.
>
> Great, thanks. If you can have it ready some time before the meeting
> so that all devs can get a chance to review it before the council
> members vo
On 25-11-2009 17:01:19 -0700, Denis Dupeyron wrote:
> It looks like this question is still unanswered:
>
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Denis Dupeyron wrote:
> >> How are dynamically linked set*id programs going to work?
Depends on how the host OS/libc handles this :)
If you're root, you ca
On 25-11-2009 16:43:32 -0700, Denis Dupeyron wrote:
> Things seem to be progressing nicely on this front. We have answers to
> the questions people had and they look satisfactory to me.
>
> One thing that I think would be valuable is a document that explains
> the average dev how to make his/her e
It looks like this question is still unanswered:
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Denis Dupeyron wrote:
>> How are dynamically linked set*id programs going to work?
Denis.
Things seem to be progressing nicely on this front. We have answers to
the questions people had and they look satisfactory to me.
One thing that I think would be valuable is a document that explains
the average dev how to make his/her ebuilds prefix compliant with
links to more details when necess
On 19-11-2009 19:42:11 -0600, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> Some questions answered. snipped the rest.
readded questions where necessary
> Denis Dupeyron wrote:
> > 2009/10/18 Tomáš Chvátal :
> >> Why on earth portage simply does not detect the prefix enviroment is being
> >> run
> >> and then INTERNALY
On 13-11-2009 12:43:25 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> In its November meeting [1], the council has unanimously expressed
> support for this proposal [2].
>
> However, there is need for additional discussion. From the council
> meeting log I could extract the following open questions:
>
> 1. Wha
Some questions answered. snipped the rest.
Denis Dupeyron wrote:
2009/10/18 Tomáš Chvátal :
Why on earth portage simply does not detect the prefix enviroment is being run
and then INTERNALY switch D->ED and other variables.
If that means we can get away without touching ebuilds, apart from
ch
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 2:11 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> This is a formal apology for springing that onto you.
Thanks a lot. Not everybody can do such a thing as a public apology. I
will nonetheless ask the council to vote on the following during next
meeting:
Ask Fabian to change his signatu
In its November meeting [1], the council has unanimously expressed
support for this proposal [2].
However, there is need for additional discussion. From the council
meeting log I could extract the following open questions:
1. What are the implications for non-prefix devs and users?
2. Shoul
On 24-10-2009 22:37:30 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
> > The suggestion was to just introduce EAPI=3 with these variables, and
> > making everything which is scheduled for current EAPI=3 just EAPI=4. I
> > was told we could quite quickly have a Portage in the tree that would
> > set ED and EROOT for
Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 18-10-2009 14:31:15 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote:
>> On 18-10-2009 13:57:10 +0200, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> You know i am totaly supporting prefix but i have one point.
>>> Why on earth portage simply does not detect the prefix enviroment is being
>>> run
>>> and
On 18-10-2009 14:31:15 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 18-10-2009 13:57:10 +0200, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> > Hi,
> > You know i am totaly supporting prefix but i have one point.
> > Why on earth portage simply does not detect the prefix enviroment is being
> > run
> > and then INTERNALY switch D-
On 18-10-2009 13:57:10 +0200, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> Hi,
> You know i am totaly supporting prefix but i have one point.
> Why on earth portage simply does not detect the prefix enviroment is being
> run
> and then INTERNALY switch D->ED and other variables. It would be much easier
> that way to
Hi,
You know i am totaly supporting prefix but i have one point.
Why on earth portage simply does not detect the prefix enviroment is being run
and then INTERNALY switch D->ED and other variables. It would be much easier
that way to migrate all stuff in portage instead of doing this || shebang.
Recently, Prefix changes have been committed to the gentoo-x86 tree, it
was rather ambitious on my part, where I moved stuff that we are not
maintainer of ourself. It should have been communicated better for
these ebuilds. This is a formal apology for springing that onto you.
This will attempt to
16 matches
Mail list logo
