Jim Northrup wrote:
might I suggest not kicking #gentoo-dev visitors who ask for voice to
speak to the devs without a 'rtfm & go get a gentoo job' smokescreen ?
That's not a metastructure change, so it's OT for this thread. However,
to help you understand the purpose of voicing someone in #g
Jan Brinkmann wrote:
> It's actually installed on toucan. You have to ssh into
> dev.gentoo.org to be able to vote.
Ah, makes sense. Sorry for bothering,
Sebastian
--
Sebastian Bergmann http://www.sebastian-bergmann.de/
GnuPG Key: 0xB85B5D69 / 27A7 2B14 09E4 98CD 6277 0E5B 6
On Wednesday 08 June 2005 17:12, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
> Daniel Drake wrote:
> > We are using dev.gentoo.org to collect ballots this year. The
> > procedure is as follows:
> >
> > $ votify --new metastructure2005
>
> Where do I get votify from?
>
>wopr-mobile ~ # votify
>zsh: comm
Log into dev and type it :P
On Wednesday 08 June 2005 12:12 pm, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
> Daniel Drake wrote:
> > We are using dev.gentoo.org to collect ballots this year. The
> > procedure is as follows:
> >
> > $ votify --new metastructure2005
>
> Where do I get votify from?
>
>wopr-
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 06:12:59PM +0200, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
> Where do I get votify from?
>
>wopr-mobile ~ # votify
>zsh: command not found: votify
>wopr-mobile ~ # emerge -s votify
>Searching...
>[ Results for search key : votify ]
>[ Applications found : 0 ]
It'
Daniel Drake wrote:
> We are using dev.gentoo.org to collect ballots this year. The
> procedure is as follows:
>
> $ votify --new metastructure2005
Where do I get votify from?
wopr-mobile ~ # votify
zsh: command not found: votify
wopr-mobile ~ # emerge -s votify
Searching...
On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 08:59 -0700, Jim Northrup wrote:
> might I suggest not kicking #gentoo-dev visitors who ask for voice to
> speak to the devs without a 'rtfm & go get a gentoo job' smokescreen ?
I hope this was only a misunderstanding / miscommunication.
#g-dev is already quite crowded and not
On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 18:12 +0200, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
> Daniel Drake wrote:
> > We are using dev.gentoo.org to collect ballots this year. The
> > procedure is as follows:
> >
> > $ votify --new metastructure2005
>
> Where do I get votify from?
ssh dev.gentoo.org
:-)
--
Stand still,
Jim Northrup wrote: [Wed Jun 08 2005, 11:59:34AM EDT]
> might I suggest not kicking #gentoo-dev visitors who ask for voice to
> speak to the devs without a 'rtfm & go get a gentoo job' smokescreen ?
Making vague statements like this doesn't help anything. If you have
a complaint, make it spec
Jim Northrup wrote:
> might I suggest not kicking #gentoo-dev visitors who ask for voice to
> speak to the devs without a 'rtfm & go get a gentoo job' smokescreen ?
Sorry? Usually if the request for voice is polite enough won't be a
problem. Voiced/avoiced people usually are known by developers for
On Wed, 08 Jun 2005 18:12:59 +0200
Sebastian Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Where do I get votify from?
>
>wopr-mobile ~ # votify
>zsh: command not found: votify
>wopr-mobile ~ # emerge -s votify
>Searching...
>[ Results for search key : votify ]
>[ Applications fo
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 08:59:34AM -0700, Jim Northrup wrote:
> might I suggest not kicking #gentoo-dev visitors who ask for voice to
> speak to the devs without a 'rtfm & go get a gentoo job' smokescreen ?
Sorry, I've missed how that's relevant to Gentoo metastructure..?
--
rob holland - [ [EMA
On Thursday 09 June 2005 00:00, Daniel Drake wrote:
> - Form a task force for additional study ("Task-Force")
> -core mail (7 June 2005) from jstubbs, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (will be available on gentoo-dev as a response to this message)
Not very patient, were we? ;)
http://dev.gentoo.org/~jstub
Paul Waring wrote: [Wed Jun 08 2005, 10:22:12AM CDT]
> On 6/8/05, Daniel Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Polls are open for the metastructure reform vote. All Gentoo developers
> > are
> > eligible to vote.
>
> Any particular reason why Gentoo users are not allowed to have a say?
Feel fr
Paul Waring wrote:
> On 6/8/05, Daniel Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Polls are open for the metastructure reform vote. All Gentoo developers are
>>eligible to vote.
>
> Any particular reason why Gentoo users are not allowed to have a say?
This is about how we organize the work between
might I suggest not kicking #gentoo-dev visitors who ask for voice to
speak to the devs without a 'rtfm & go get a gentoo job' smokescreen ?
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 16:22 +0100, Paul Waring wrote:
> On 6/8/05, Daniel Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Polls are open for the metastructure reform vote. All Gentoo developers
> > are
> > eligible to vote.
>
> Any particular reason why Gentoo users are not allowed to have a say?
Because
On 6/8/05, Daniel Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Polls are open for the metastructure reform vote. All Gentoo developers are
> eligible to vote.
Any particular reason why Gentoo users are not allowed to have a say?
Paul
--
Rogue Tory
http://www.roguetory.org.uk
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Daniel Drake wrote:
> - Form a task force for additional study ("Task-Force")
> -core mail (7 June 2005) from jstubbs, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (will be available on gentoo-dev as a response to this message)
Jason Stubbs' proposal:
I'm past this deadline, but I'd like to propose a modified "keepin
Please keep future information regarding this poll public on gentoo-dev or
similar.
[publicising on gentoo-dev with permission from Grant Goodyear]
Dear all,
Polls are open for the metastructure reform vote. All Gentoo developers are
eligible to vote.
The proposals up for vote:
- The "FOSDEM
20 matches
Mail list logo
