I have seen no real opposition for the creation of the -project mailing
list and even this ML changes thread itself involved the creation of the
-project mailing (the thread itself is a prime example on why we need
-project in the first place) so how about we just get that mailing list
going right
Petteri Räty wrote:
I have seen no real opposition for the creation of the -project mailing
list and even this ML changes thread itself involved the creation of the
-project mailing (the thread itself is a prime example on why we need
-project in the first place) so how about we just get that
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 10:04:55AM +0300, Petteri R??ty wrote:
I have seen no real opposition for the creation of the -project mailing
list and even this ML changes thread itself involved the creation of the
-project mailing (the thread itself is a prime example on why we need
-project in the
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 10:04:55AM +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
I have seen no real opposition for the creation of the -project mailing
list
(just to avoid misunderstandings, we're not only talking about
creating -project, but also the stuff that people with non @gentoo.org
address get moderated
Wernfried Haas kirjoitti:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 10:04:55AM +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
I have seen no real opposition for the creation of the -project mailing
list
(just to avoid misunderstandings, we're not only talking about
creating -project, but also the stuff that people with non
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 09:49:32AM +0200, Wernfried Haas wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 10:04:55AM +0300, Petteri R?ty wrote:
I have seen no real opposition for the creation of the -project mailing
list
(just to avoid misunderstandings, we're not only talking about
creating -project, but
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 10:54:35AM +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
No, just the mailing list. Dunno but I tried to make that clear in my mail.
Oops, sorry. No opposition to _that_. ;-)
cheers,
Wernfried
--
Wernfried Haas (amne) - amne (at) gentoo.org
Gentoo Forums -
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 10:04:55 +0300
Petteri Räty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have seen no real opposition for the creation of the -project
mailing list and even this ML changes thread itself involved the
creation of the -project mailing (the thread itself is a prime
example on why we need
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 11:00 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
How about defining the purpose of all these list with which we'll
soon end up before going ahead and requesting changes?
-dev is just for technical development.
-project is for non technical development of Gentoo.
What is technical
Roy Marples wrote:
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 11:00 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
How about defining the purpose of all these list with which we'll
soon end up before going ahead and requesting changes?
-dev is just for technical development.
-project is for non technical development of Gentoo.
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 14:13 +0100, George Prowse wrote:
So that would mean that welcoming new developers would be on the
-project list?
Or on say gentoo-announce, but yes.
Would package removals be on it because it seems to be somewhere in the
middle?
That's an announcement, so I would
George Prowse wrote:
So that would mean that welcoming new developers would be on the
-project list?
My thinking, I think they would fit better over there, since it is somewhat
non-technical. However, machine-generated notices of dev arrival or dev
departure could be directed to other
Kumba wrote:
George Prowse wrote:
So that would mean that welcoming new developers would be on the
-project list?
My thinking, I think they would fit better over there, since it is somewhat
non-technical. However, machine-generated notices of dev arrival or dev
departure could be
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 11:30 -0600, Joe Peterson wrote:
Seems to me that new dev announcements should be on [perhaps the
announcement variant] of -dev, since they are related to the development
team. It'd be nice to hear those announcements on the list devs are
required to subscribe to, so all
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 12:28:09AM -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 10:04:55AM +0300, Petteri R??ty wrote:
I have seen no real opposition for the creation of the -project mailing
list and even this ML changes thread itself involved the creation of the
-project mailing
070717 Robin H. Johnson wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 10:04:55AM +0300, Petteri R??ty wrote:
I have seen no real opposition for the creation of the -project list
so how about we just get that mailing list going right now
and let the rest of it fall into place later.
My guess is that if we
Philip Webb wrote:
To this user since 2003, who plans to install Gentoo in the new machine
which I am presently designing, this sounds like a very welcome development.
I shall continue to subscribe to -dev , but not to -project.
Should I also subscribe to -dev-announce
or will its msgs be
17 matches
Mail list logo
