On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 11:33:40PM +0400, Diamond wrote:
Lets assume, that I don't want to scrap old ebuild yet. There's no git
cp command. git mv is just git rm + git add. That's what does it look
like (usual revbump with git add in reality):
On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 13:08:11 -0700
W. Trevor King wk...@tremily.us wrote:
Git can check for copies if you like:
$ git clone git://github.com/cerebrum/dr.git
$ cd dr/
$ git show --find-copies-harder 311df9b04
…
copy from games-strategy/openra/openra-20140608.ebuild
copy to
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 01:01:13AM +0400, Diamond wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 13:08:11 -0700 W. Trevor King wrote:
Git can check for copies if you like:
$ git clone git://github.com/cerebrum/dr.git
$ cd dr/
$ git show --find-copies-harder 311df9b04
…
copy from
On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 14:29:41 -0700
W. Trevor King wk...@tremily.us wrote:
So Git works great, and GitHub's web UI doesn't support all of Git's
bells and whistles, so… switch to a different VCS? Personally, my
conclusion is “just use Git from the command line”. It's not like
you're
On 19 September 2014 10:13, Diamond diam...@hi-net.ru wrote:
P.S. As you see from description this option affects git performance.
So, we probably can arrive at a conclusion that git itself isn't good
at all for package management. Maybe there are better architectural
decisions for that.
Diamond wrote:
we probably can arrive at a conclusion that git itself isn't good
at all for package management.
I don't think we can. Please stop the nonsense, at least until you
have created something superior to git.
//Peter
