Re: [gentoo-dev] It seems our ChangeLogs are quite borked
On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 12:29:06AM +0200, Petteri Räty wrote: I got annoyed enough about emerge -pl not working when people don't use echangelog like: # $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/x11-libs/libXinerama/ChangeLog,v 1.27 2007/03/22 02:18:21 joshuabaergen Exp $ 22 Mar 2007; Joshua Baergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] +libXinerama-1.0.2.ebuild: Version bump. Includes new documentation and some small code tweaks. Because it's missing *libXinerama-1.0.2 (22 Mar 2007) emerge -pl does not work. This lead me to write the code to detect these cases: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=171962 You can find the results here: http://dev.gentoo.org/~betelgeuse/changelogs_with_bad_new_revision_entries.txt Most of these probably probably date back to time before echangelog but feel free to fix your packages any way :) It complains about the fpc changelog, for 2.0.0-r1, but it seems okay to me: [...] 17 Dec 2005; Carsten Lohrke [EMAIL PROTECTED] +fpc-2.0.0-r1.ebuild: restore ebuild for dev-lang/lazarus *fpc-2.0.2 (17 Dec 2005) 17 Dec 2005; Carsten Lohrke [EMAIL PROTECTED] -fpc-1.9.5_pre20040820.ebuild, -fpc-2.0.0_rc2.ebuild, -fpc-2.0.0.ebuild, -fpc-2.0.0-r1.ebuild, +fpc-2.0.2.ebuild: version bump 14 Oct 2005; Gustavo Zacarias [EMAIL PROTECTED] fpc-2.0.0-r1.ebuild: Added sparc support and keyworded accordingly 15 Sep 2005; Marcelo Goes [EMAIL PROTECTED] fpc-1.9.5_pre20040820.ebuild: Add app-arch/unzip to DEPEND for bug 69831. 24 Jul 2005; Herbie Hopkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] fpc-2.0.0-r1.ebuild: Added amd64 support thanks to Matthias Jansen. *fpc-2.0.0-r1 (03 Jul 2005) [...] Or should the *fpc-2.0.0-r1 line be repeated? Also, would it be possible to sort the packages in some way? pgphE8QDONytz.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] It seems our ChangeLogs are quite borked
Harald van Dijk kirjoitti:
*fpc-2.0.0-r1 (03 Jul 2005)
[...]
Or should the *fpc-2.0.0-r1 line be repeated?
Also, would it be possible to sort the packages in some way?
This is a case that the script does not currently detect. IMHO the *${P}
line should be there if it brings more info to users with emerge -pl
changelog. I will modify the script to also the rest of the line for the
entries beside to the start.
Regards,
Petteri
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] It seems our ChangeLogs are quite borked
Harald van Dijk kirjoitti: It complains about the fpc changelog, for 2.0.0-r1, but it seems okay to me: Fixed the script to take package moves into account. Also, would it be possible to sort the packages in some way? The list is now sorted and I added a check for bad date entries in the new revision/version entries: http://dev.gentoo.org/~betelgeuse/changelogs_syntax_errors.txt Regards, Petteri signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[gentoo-dev] It seems our ChangeLogs are quite borked
I got annoyed enough about emerge -pl not working when people don't use echangelog like: # $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/x11-libs/libXinerama/ChangeLog,v 1.27 2007/03/22 02:18:21 joshuabaergen Exp $ 22 Mar 2007; Joshua Baergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] +libXinerama-1.0.2.ebuild: Version bump. Includes new documentation and some small code tweaks. Because it's missing *libXinerama-1.0.2 (22 Mar 2007) emerge -pl does not work. This lead me to write the code to detect these cases: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=171962 You can find the results here: http://dev.gentoo.org/~betelgeuse/changelogs_with_bad_new_revision_entries.txt Most of these probably probably date back to time before echangelog but feel free to fix your packages any way :) Regards, Petteri signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] It seems our ChangeLogs are quite borked
Petteri Räty kirjoitti: You can find the results here: http://dev.gentoo.org/~betelgeuse/changelogs_with_bad_new_revision_entries.txt Most of these probably probably date back to time before echangelog but feel free to fix your packages any way :) Regards, Petteri It should also be quite easy to write a program to automatically fix these. Regards, Petteri signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] It seems our ChangeLogs are quite borked
Petteri Räty wrote: I got annoyed enough about emerge -pl not working when people don't use echangelog like: # $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/x11-libs/libXinerama/ChangeLog,v 1.27 2007/03/22 02:18:21 joshuabaergen Exp $ 22 Mar 2007; Joshua Baergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] +libXinerama-1.0.2.ebuild: Version bump. Includes new documentation and some small code tweaks. Because it's missing *libXinerama-1.0.2 (22 Mar 2007) emerge -pl does not work. This lead me to write the code to detect these cases: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=171962 You can find the results here: http://dev.gentoo.org/~betelgeuse/changelogs_with_bad_new_revision_entries.txt Most of these probably probably date back to time before echangelog but feel free to fix your packages any way :) Regards, Petteri I actually did use echangelog, so maybe something else is going on here... Josh signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] It seems our ChangeLogs are quite borked
Joshua Baergen wrote: Petteri Räty wrote: I got annoyed enough about emerge -pl not working when people don't use echangelog like: # $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/x11-libs/libXinerama/ChangeLog,v 1.27 2007/03/22 02:18:21 joshuabaergen Exp $ 22 Mar 2007; Joshua Baergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] +libXinerama-1.0.2.ebuild: Version bump. Includes new documentation and some small code tweaks. Because it's missing *libXinerama-1.0.2 (22 Mar 2007) emerge -pl does not work. This lead me to write the code to detect these cases: I actually did use echangelog, so maybe something else is going on here... Josh It appears to be a problem with gentoolkit-dev-0.2.6.3. 0.2.6.2 produces proper changelogs. Josh signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] It seems our ChangeLogs are quite borked
It appears to be a problem with gentoolkit-dev-0.2.6.3. 0.2.6.2 produces proper changelogs. Same here. -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] It seems our ChangeLogs are quite borked
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 18:24:20 -0600 Joshua Baergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Joshua Baergen wrote: Petteri Räty wrote: I actually did use echangelog, so maybe something else is going on here... It appears to be a problem with gentoolkit-dev-0.2.6.3. 0.2.6.2 produces proper changelogs. Josh Reproduced here too. Here, http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/x11-themes/gartoon/ChangeLog?r1=1.8r2=1.9 -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
