Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-cdr/sync2d

2020-06-06 Thread Christopher Head
On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 21:39:51 -0400 Aaron Bauman wrote: > Of course, the depgraph is not an issue. If a package is > masked, it will break immediately. Hence, required checks > are run then the package is masked. I meant that if $P is removed, then things that $P depends on could also start

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-cdr/sync2d

2020-06-06 Thread Mart Raudsepp
Ühel kenal päeval, L, 06.06.2020 kell 03:59, kirjutas Ralph Seichter: > * Christopher Head: > > > Not that I care about this specific case, but isn’t the 30-day time > > period also meant as a nice long warning time for people [...] > > Rules and exceptions. I think that shortening the typical

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-cdr/sync2d

2020-06-05 Thread Ralph Seichter
* Christopher Head: > Not that I care about this specific case, but isn’t the 30-day time > period also meant as a nice long warning time for people [...] Rules and exceptions. I think that shortening the typical 30-day period is acceptable in specific cases, and sync2d is one of them. According

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-cdr/sync2d

2020-06-05 Thread Aaron Bauman
On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 06:27:51PM -0700, Christopher Head wrote: > On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 12:40:17 -0700 > Matt Turner wrote: > > > With that in mind, I don't expect it to gain Python 3 support, nor do > > I expect an additional 15 days of waiting time to change that fact. 15 > > vs 30 days doesn't

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-cdr/sync2d

2020-06-05 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 18:27:51 -0700 Christopher Head wrote: > On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 12:40:17 -0700 > Matt Turner wrote: > > > With that in mind, I don't expect it to gain Python 3 support, nor > > do I expect an additional 15 days of waiting time to change that > > fact. 15 vs 30 days doesn't seem

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-cdr/sync2d

2020-06-05 Thread Christopher Head
On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 12:40:17 -0700 Matt Turner wrote: > With that in mind, I don't expect it to gain Python 3 support, nor do > I expect an additional 15 days of waiting time to change that fact. 15 > vs 30 days doesn't seem worth squabbling over. Not that I care about this specific case, but

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-cdr/sync2d

2020-06-05 Thread Aaron Bauman
On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 12:40:17PM -0700, Matt Turner wrote: > On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 9:55 AM Jonas Stein wrote: > > > > On 04/06/2020 01.39, Aaron Bauman wrote: > > > # Aaron Bauman (2020-06-03) > > > # py2 only. dead upstream. m-n. > > > # Masked for removal in 15 days > > > app-cdr/sync2cd >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-cdr/sync2d

2020-06-05 Thread Matt Turner
On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 9:55 AM Jonas Stein wrote: > > On 04/06/2020 01.39, Aaron Bauman wrote: > > # Aaron Bauman (2020-06-03) > > # py2 only. dead upstream. m-n. > > # Masked for removal in 15 days > > app-cdr/sync2cd > > > > is there a good reason to reduce the time to 15 days? > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-cdr/sync2d

2020-06-05 Thread Jonas Stein
On 04/06/2020 01.39, Aaron Bauman wrote: > # Aaron Bauman (2020-06-03) > # py2 only. dead upstream. m-n. > # Masked for removal in 15 days > app-cdr/sync2cd > is there a good reason to reduce the time to 15 days? https://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-maintenance/removal/index.html "Wait 30 days

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-cdr/sync2d

2020-06-03 Thread Aaron Bauman
# Aaron Bauman (2020-06-03) # py2 only. dead upstream. m-n. # Masked for removal in 15 days app-cdr/sync2cd -- Cheers, Aaron signature.asc Description: PGP signature