Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: sys-cluster/slurm
Hi, I think it makes sense. I still have no experience proxy maintaining and if you do... Still, I'll have a look at some of the open bugs during the next week, hopefully. Best On 23/8/22 19:24, Daniel M. Weeks wrote: On 8/15/22 09:48, David Palao wrote: Oh! That's a pity! I need that package... Is there anything I can do to keep using slurm with my gentoo box? Best I just added an updated ebuild in my junkdrawer overlay. I would be willing to proxy maintain the package in gentoo.
Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: sys-cluster/slurm
On 8/15/22 09:48, David Palao wrote: Oh! That's a pity! I need that package... Is there anything I can do to keep using slurm with my gentoo box? Best I just added an updated ebuild in my junkdrawer overlay. I would be willing to proxy maintain the package in gentoo. -- Daniel M. Weeks
Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: sys-cluster/slurm
> On 16 Aug 2022, at 17:48, David Palao wrote: > > On 15/8/22 16:00, Sam James wrote: >> >>> On 15 Aug 2022, at 14:48, David Palao wrote: >>> >>> Oh! That's a pity! I need that package... >>> >>> Is there anything I can do to keep using slurm with my gentoo box? >>> >> Is there any chance you'd be willing to adopt it? >> >> (https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Proxy_Maintainers/User_Guide) > > > That would be great! Thank you for the link. > > It's my first time, so what comes next? Should I try to fix the bugs? > (#631552, #790296, #842789) > > Exactly! Ideally do a GitHub PR adopting the package and fixing bugs in the process (it's ok not to fix them all at once, just do a bump if one exists, and try to start fixing them). >>> Best >> best, >> sam >> > Best, sam signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: sys-cluster/slurm
On 15/8/22 16:00, Sam James wrote: On 15 Aug 2022, at 14:48, David Palao wrote: Oh! That's a pity! I need that package... Is there anything I can do to keep using slurm with my gentoo box? Is there any chance you'd be willing to adopt it? (https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Proxy_Maintainers/User_Guide) That would be great! Thank you for the link. It's my first time, so what comes next? Should I try to fix the bugs? (#631552, #790296, #842789) Best best, sam
Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: sys-cluster/slurm
> On 15 Aug 2022, at 14:48, David Palao wrote: > > Oh! That's a pity! I need that package... > > Is there anything I can do to keep using slurm with my gentoo box? > Is there any chance you'd be willing to adopt it? (https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Proxy_Maintainers/User_Guide) > > Best best, sam signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: sys-cluster/slurm
Oh! That's a pity! I need that package... Is there anything I can do to keep using slurm with my gentoo box? Best On 15/8/22 2:37, John Helmert III wrote: # John Helmert III (2022-08-14) # Many vulnerabilities (including code execution and root privilege # escalation), effectively unmaintained. Removal in 30 days, bugs # #631552, #790296, #842789 sys-cluster/slurm
Keeping unused acct-{user,group} packages. Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: sys-cluster/slurm
On 15/08/2022 09.31, Ionen Wolkens wrote:
On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 08:56:51AM +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Mon, 15 Aug 2022, John Helmert wrote:
# John Helmert III (2022-08-14)
# Many vulnerabilities (including code execution and root privilege
# escalation), effectively unmaintained. Removal in 30 days, bugs
# #631552, #790296, #842789
sys-cluster/slurm
This will leave acct-{user,group}/slurm without reverse dependencies.
Last-rite them, too?
Aren't we still stuck on what to do with [1]?
[1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/781881
FWIW, I am not sure why we should keep the unused acct-{user,group}
packages. At least I don't see how removing them would cause any issues
or confusion? The bug appears to be light on arguments in favor of
keeping them. Quite contrary, I think keeping them could cause some
confusion, as users may start looking for the according actual package
and hope to find it.
But maybe I am missing something?
Needless to say that I am only talking about the acct-{user,group}
packages, the uid-gid.txt reservation should stay for obvious reasons.
And this also rules out that the IDs are re-assigned.
- Flow
Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: sys-cluster/slurm
On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 08:56:51AM +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > On Mon, 15 Aug 2022, John Helmert wrote:
>
> > # John Helmert III (2022-08-14)
> > # Many vulnerabilities (including code execution and root privilege
> > # escalation), effectively unmaintained. Removal in 30 days, bugs
> > # #631552, #790296, #842789
> > sys-cluster/slurm
>
> This will leave acct-{user,group}/slurm without reverse dependencies.
> Last-rite them, too?
Aren't we still stuck on what to do with [1]?
[1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/781881
--
ionen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: sys-cluster/slurm
> On Mon, 15 Aug 2022, John Helmert wrote:
> # John Helmert III (2022-08-14)
> # Many vulnerabilities (including code execution and root privilege
> # escalation), effectively unmaintained. Removal in 30 days, bugs
> # #631552, #790296, #842789
> sys-cluster/slurm
This will leave acct-{user,group}/slurm without reverse dependencies.
Last-rite them, too?
Ulrich
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-dev] Last rites: sys-cluster/slurm
# John Helmert III (2022-08-14) # Many vulnerabilities (including code execution and root privilege # escalation), effectively unmaintained. Removal in 30 days, bugs # #631552, #790296, #842789 sys-cluster/slurm signature.asc Description: PGP signature
