On 04.05.23 20:59, Maciej Barć wrote:
R.i.p. to a lot od desktop users on non-state-of-the-art HW.
Building Chromium inside a cloud VM may be an option for some users with
older hardware. When using e.g.
https://github.com/hartwork/binary-gentoo for that, the VM doesn't even
have to run Gen
> On Thu, 04 May 2023, James Le Cuirot wrote:
>> On May 4, 2023 6:38:32 PM UTC, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>> > # Out of date by several versions. Many unresolved security
>> > # vulnerabilities. Lack of manpower/interest in keeping it up to date.
>> > # Removal on 2023-06-03.
>> > www-client/chromi
James you either got into my localnet or you are reading my mind.
That's what I swapped chromium-bin for. This is because I need to test
some stuff on Chromium based-browser(s) specifically.
W dniu 4.05.2023 o 23:06, James Le Cuirot pisze:
On May 4, 2023 6:38:32 PM UTC, Mike Gilbert wrote:
#
> On May 4, 2023 6:38:32 PM UTC, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> > # Out of date by several versions. Many unresolved security
> > # vulnerabilities. Lack of manpower/interest in keeping it up to date.
> > # Removal on 2023-06-03.
> > www-client/chromium-bin
> >
> On Thu, 2023-05-04 at 18:59 +, Maciej
R.i.p. to a lot od desktop users on non-state-of-the-art HW.
But chromium source build was unusable for long time with big UI bugs.
On May 4, 2023 6:38:32 PM UTC, Mike Gilbert wrote:
># Out of date by several versions. Many unresolved security
># vulnerabilities. Lack of manpower/interest in keep
# Out of date by several versions. Many unresolved security
# vulnerabilities. Lack of manpower/interest in keeping it up to date.
# Removal on 2023-06-03.
www-client/chromium-bin
On 3/5/11 12:51 AM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> Dne 5.3.2011 00:46, Alex Alexander napsal(a):
>> Chromium has its own version of webkit :)
> For this lovely thing it should be webkit-gtk
Actually, Alex is right. Chromium has its own port of WebKit, different
from Qt and GTK ports. Reasons for that incl
On Fri, 4 Mar 2011 21:41:30 -0500
Rich Freeman wrote:
> and for me the bigger benefit is not sucking down half a gig of RAM.
Oh, that's exactly what is catching more and more users out: Hey I got
8 cores so I can run MAKEOPTS=-j8! What happens? With only 6GB RAM, and
each of those eight cc1plus
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 09:41:30PM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
<...>
> For kicks I tried to do better with distcc and EC2. That worked great
> until it started running a bunch of python scripts in the makefile -
> at -j15 or whatever I had it set to. Distcc really needs a solution
> for the fact t
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 6:46 PM, Alex Alexander wrote:
> Anyway, compilation on a modern system shouldn't take more than an
> hour. ~15-20 minutes on a quad i5.
Clearly your definition of modern doesn't include my server... :)
Just checked and the last build clocked in at 192 minutes. I need to
Alex Alexander dixit (2011-03-05, 01:46):
> On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 12:32:15AM +0100, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Dne 4.3.2011 10:35, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." napsal(a):
> > > # Pawel Hajdan jr (04 Mar 2011)
> > > # Masked for removal in 90 days.
On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 12:51:23AM +0100, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Dne 5.3.2011 00:46, Alex Alexander napsal(a):
> >
> > What system webkit? Chromium has its own version of webkit :)
> For this lovely thing it should be webkit-gtk
> >
> > Anyway,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dne 5.3.2011 00:46, Alex Alexander napsal(a):
>
> What system webkit? Chromium has its own version of webkit :)
For this lovely thing it should be webkit-gtk
>
> Anyway, compilation on a modern system shouldn't take more than an
> hour. ~15-20 minute
On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 12:32:15AM +0100, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Dne 4.3.2011 10:35, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." napsal(a):
> > # Pawel Hajdan jr (04 Mar 2011)
> > # Masked for removal in 90 days.
> > # Multiple hard to fix and time consuming maintenanc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dne 4.3.2011 10:35, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." napsal(a):
> # Pawel Hajdan jr (04 Mar 2011)
> # Masked for removal in 90 days.
> # Multiple hard to fix and time consuming maintenance problems:
> # - history of bugs (bug #304527, bug #335101, bug #347175,
>
# Pawel Hajdan jr (04 Mar 2011)
# Masked for removal in 90 days.
# Multiple hard to fix and time consuming maintenance problems:
# - history of bugs (bug #304527, bug #335101, bug #347175,
#bug #349249, bug #356609)
# - upstream's binary builds cannot be used on Gentoo
#as easily as othe
16 matches
Mail list logo