Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for net-dns/ldapdns

2009-12-26 Thread Mario Fetka (geos_one) 
Am Samstag 26 Dezember 2009 06:47:51 schrieb Victor Ostorga:
 On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 07:00:22 -0800
 
 Joshua Saddler nightmo...@gentoo.org wrote:
  On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:40:06 -0600
 
  Victor Ostorga vosto...@gentoo.org wrote:
   # Víctor Ostorga vosto...@gentoo.org (23 Dec 2009)
   # Last bump in 2005, does not build against current
   # stable net-nds/openldap-2.4.19-r1 bug #247956
   # Removal in 30 days
   net-dns/ldapdns
 
  So what about http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/ldapdns-guide.xml -- you
  want the GDP to just remove the doc? We can do that.
 
 Yes, it will be needed to remove the doc.
 
  Is there a compatible drop-in replacement that will allow us to
  s/ldapdns/foo throughout the guide?
 
 Unfortunately, I don't know an exact replacemente for ldapdns, at some
 point I heard about a LDAP sdb back-end for BIND 9 [1], but don't know
 if it is still functional.
 
 [1] http://bind9-ldap.bayour.com/
 
and also powerdns
has ldap support
the bind sdb ldap backand is in tree
both ldap backands share the same ldap structure with some small diffferences

Mario

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for net-dns/ldapdns

2009-12-26 Thread Joshua Saddler 
On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 23:47:51 -0600
Victor Ostorga vosto...@gentoo.org wrote:

 Yes, it will be needed to remove the doc.
 
  Is there a compatible drop-in replacement that will allow us to
  s/ldapdns/foo throughout the guide?
 
 Unfortunately, I don't know an exact replacemente for ldapdns, at some
 point I heard about a LDAP sdb back-end for BIND 9 [1], but don't know
 if it is still functional.
 
 [1] http://bind9-ldap.bayour.com/

Well, without documentation on how to use it, we can't do anything, so I just 
removed the LDAP DNS guide entirely. RESO FIXED from the GDP.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for net-dns/ldapdns

2009-12-25 Thread Joshua Saddler 
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:40:06 -0600
Victor Ostorga vosto...@gentoo.org wrote:

 
 # Víctor Ostorga vosto...@gentoo.org (23 Dec 2009)
 # Last bump in 2005, does not build against current
 # stable net-nds/openldap-2.4.19-r1 bug #247956
 # Removal in 30 days
 net-dns/ldapdns
 

So what about http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/ldapdns-guide.xml -- you want the 
GDP to just remove the doc? We can do that.

Is there a compatible drop-in replacement that will allow us to s/ldapdns/foo 
throughout the guide?


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for net-dns/ldapdns

2009-12-25 Thread Victor Ostorga 
On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 07:00:22 -0800
Joshua Saddler nightmo...@gentoo.org wrote:

 On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:40:06 -0600
 Victor Ostorga vosto...@gentoo.org wrote:
 
  
  # Víctor Ostorga vosto...@gentoo.org (23 Dec 2009)
  # Last bump in 2005, does not build against current
  # stable net-nds/openldap-2.4.19-r1 bug #247956
  # Removal in 30 days
  net-dns/ldapdns
  
 
 So what about http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/ldapdns-guide.xml -- you
 want the GDP to just remove the doc? We can do that.
 
Yes, it will be needed to remove the doc.

 Is there a compatible drop-in replacement that will allow us to
 s/ldapdns/foo throughout the guide?

Unfortunately, I don't know an exact replacemente for ldapdns, at some
point I heard about a LDAP sdb back-end for BIND 9 [1], but don't know
if it is still functional.

[1] http://bind9-ldap.bayour.com/

Regards,

Víctor


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Last rites for net-dns/ldapdns

2009-12-23 Thread Victor Ostorga 

# Víctor Ostorga vosto...@gentoo.org (23 Dec 2009)
# Last bump in 2005, does not build against current
# stable net-nds/openldap-2.4.19-r1 bug #247956
# Removal in 30 days
net-dns/ldapdns