-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
# Manuel Rüger mr...@gentoo.org (6 Nov 2014)
# Use kde-base/oxygen-fonts instead
# Masked for removal in 30 days
media-fonts/oxygen-fonts
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0
On Thu, 06 Nov 2014 22:03:26 +0100
Manuel Rüger mr...@gentoo.org wrote:
# Manuel Rüger mr...@gentoo.org (6 Nov 2014)
# Use kde-base/oxygen-fonts instead
# Masked for removal in 30 days
media-fonts/oxygen-fonts
That one wasn't up for a pkgmove?
jer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 06.11.2014 23:19, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
On Thu, 06 Nov 2014 22:03:26 +0100 Manuel Rüger mr...@gentoo.org
wrote:
# Manuel Rüger mr...@gentoo.org (6 Nov 2014) # Use
kde-base/oxygen-fonts instead # Masked for removal in 30 days
On Thu, 06 Nov 2014 23:44:24 +0100
Manuel Rüger mr...@gentoo.org wrote:
It could have been introduced to the tree as a pkgmove, but it wasn't.
The best solution for now is imho to lastrite it.
You could still do the pkgmove right now, and not wait thirty days. :)
jer
On Thu, 6 Nov 2014 23:47:20 +0100
Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, 06 Nov 2014 23:44:24 +0100
Manuel Rüger mr...@gentoo.org wrote:
It could have been introduced to the tree as a pkgmove, but it
wasn't. The best solution for now is imho to lastrite it.
You could still do the
On Thu, 6 Nov 2014 22:49:38 +
Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
Not if the new package has already been added you can't. Moving a
package on top of an existing package is very very bad.
Also, the versions don't actually match so the content will probably
have changed.
