Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastriting dev-libs/libffi (replaced by USE libffi in gcc itself)

2008-06-12 Thread Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Donnie Berkholz wrote: | On 14:52 Thu 05 Jun , Samuli Suominen wrote: | # Samuli Suominen [EMAIL PROTECTED] (05 Jun 2008) | # Masked for removal in ~30 days by treecleaners. | # Replaced by USE libffi in sys-devel/gcc. Bug 163724. |

Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastriting dev-libs/libffi (replaced by USE libffi in gcc itself)

2008-06-06 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 05-06-2008 22:47:28 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: On 14:52 Thu 05 Jun , Samuli Suominen wrote: # Samuli Suominen [EMAIL PROTECTED] (05 Jun 2008) # Masked for removal in ~30 days by treecleaners. # Replaced by USE libffi in sys-devel/gcc. Bug 163724. dev-libs/libffi

Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastriting dev-libs/libffi (replaced by USE libffi in gcc itself)

2008-06-06 Thread Luis Francisco Araujo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David Leverton wrote: | On Thursday 05 June 2008 19:21:24 Albert Zeyer wrote: | Are you sure that Squeak really depends on libffi? | | I just compiled it (squeak-3.9.7) fine without having libffi on my | system and with disabled libffi USE-flag. | |

[gentoo-dev] Lastriting dev-libs/libffi (replaced by USE libffi in gcc itself)

2008-06-05 Thread Samuli Suominen
# Samuli Suominen [EMAIL PROTECTED] (05 Jun 2008) # Masked for removal in ~30 days by treecleaners. # Replaced by USE libffi in sys-devel/gcc. Bug 163724. dev-libs/libffi dev-lang/squeak x11-libs/gtk-server Squeak and gtk-server maintainers still have time to rescue their ebuild, just enough time

Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastriting dev-libs/libffi (replaced by USE libffi in gcc itself)

2008-06-05 Thread Albert Zeyer
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 14:52 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote: # Samuli Suominen [EMAIL PROTECTED] (05 Jun 2008) # Masked for removal in ~30 days by treecleaners. # Replaced by USE libffi in sys-devel/gcc. Bug 163724. dev-libs/libffi dev-lang/squeak x11-libs/gtk-server Squeak and gtk-server

Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastriting dev-libs/libffi (replaced by USE libffi in gcc itself)

2008-06-05 Thread David Leverton
On Thursday 05 June 2008 19:21:24 Albert Zeyer wrote: Are you sure that Squeak really depends on libffi? I just compiled it (squeak-3.9.7) fine without having libffi on my system and with disabled libffi USE-flag. According to my reading of the code, it doesn't use libffi on x86-linux,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastriting dev-libs/libffi (replaced by USE libffi in gcc itself)

2008-06-05 Thread Samuli Suominen
Thu, 05 Jun 2008 21:21:24 +0300 Albert Zeyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] kirjoitti: On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 14:52 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote: # Samuli Suominen [EMAIL PROTECTED] (05 Jun 2008) # Masked for removal in ~30 days by treecleaners. # Replaced by USE libffi in sys-devel/gcc. Bug 163724.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastriting dev-libs/libffi (replaced by USE libffi in gcc itself)

2008-06-05 Thread Albert Zeyer
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 19:54 +0100, David Leverton wrote: On Thursday 05 June 2008 19:21:24 Albert Zeyer wrote: Are you sure that Squeak really depends on libffi? I just compiled it (squeak-3.9.7) fine without having libffi on my system and with disabled libffi USE-flag. According to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastriting dev-libs/libffi (replaced by USE libffi in gcc itself)

2008-06-05 Thread Luis Francisco Araujo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Samuli Suominen wrote: | # Samuli Suominen [EMAIL PROTECTED] (05 Jun 2008) | # Masked for removal in ~30 days by treecleaners. | # Replaced by USE libffi in sys-devel/gcc. Bug 163724. | dev-libs/libffi | dev-lang/squeak | x11-libs/gtk-server | |

Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastriting dev-libs/libffi (replaced by USE libffi in gcc itself)

2008-06-05 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 14:52 Thu 05 Jun , Samuli Suominen wrote: # Samuli Suominen [EMAIL PROTECTED] (05 Jun 2008) # Masked for removal in ~30 days by treecleaners. # Replaced by USE libffi in sys-devel/gcc. Bug 163724. dev-libs/libffi dev-lang/squeak x11-libs/gtk-server The latest version of g-wrap