On 09/05/2016 08:54 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> On 09/05/2016 04:45 AM, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
>> On Wed, 2016-08-24 at 11:43 +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>>> On 08/24/2016 11:26 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
Hello
Most Gnome team member are not willing to keep maintaining
On 09/05/2016 04:45 AM, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-08-24 at 11:43 +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>> On 08/24/2016 11:26 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
>>> Hello
>>>
>>> Most Gnome team member are not willing to keep maintaining cinnamon
>>> ebuilds (specially since most of us are not even
On Wed, 2016-08-24 at 11:43 +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> On 08/24/2016 11:26 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > Most Gnome team member are not willing to keep maintaining cinnamon
> > ebuilds (specially since most of us are not even using it and,
> > also, we
> > already have
On 08/24/2016 11:26 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> Hello
>
> Most Gnome team member are not willing to keep maintaining cinnamon
> ebuilds (specially since most of us are not even using it and, also, we
> already have enough load with Gnome ebuilds alone).
>
> We were wondering if maybe some other
Hello
Most Gnome team member are not willing to keep maintaining cinnamon
ebuilds (specially since most of us are not even using it and, also, we
already have enough load with Gnome ebuilds alone).
We were wondering if maybe some other people would be willing to
maintain them under a new
