Re: [gentoo-dev] Maintainer needed for dev-tcltk/expect
On 16/12/10 21:16, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Thursday, December 16, 2010 03:01:58 justin wrote: the tcltk herd is nearly dead. I am fixing bugs there and I am getting the queue down to an excaptable number. The only package which makes me headaches is dev-tcltk/expect. It seems, that there are quite some devs who are using this package. Could anyone of them stand up and take the maintainership for it? This would be a great help for me! i do like expect, and tcl deserves some special love. i'll see about doing a round of bug squashing with it. -mike Thanks Mike, that helps a lot. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[gentoo-dev] Maintainer needed for dev-tcltk/expect
Hi all, the tcltk herd is nearly dead. I am fixing bugs there and I am getting the queue down to an excaptable number. The only package which makes me headaches is dev-tcltk/expect. It seems, that there are quite some devs who are using this package. Could anyone of them stand up and take the maintainership for it? This would be a great help for me! Thanks justin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Maintainer needed for dev-tcltk/expect
On Thursday, December 16, 2010 03:01:58 justin wrote: the tcltk herd is nearly dead. I am fixing bugs there and I am getting the queue down to an excaptable number. The only package which makes me headaches is dev-tcltk/expect. It seems, that there are quite some devs who are using this package. Could anyone of them stand up and take the maintainership for it? This would be a great help for me! i do like expect, and tcl deserves some special love. i'll see about doing a round of bug squashing with it. -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
