Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X: unmasking tonight, RFC

2006-04-21 Thread Bertrand Jacquin
On 4/20/06, Stephen P. Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bertrand Jacquin wrote: On 4/19/06, Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bertrand Jacquin wrote: Is it planned to release some xserver ebuilds ? Could you rephrase the question? I don't understand it. I can't any ebuild for

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X: unmasking tonight, RFC

2006-04-20 Thread Bertrand Jacquin
On 4/19/06, Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bertrand Jacquin wrote: Is it planned to release some xserver ebuilds ? Could you rephrase the question? I don't understand it. I can't any ebuild for xserver (http://www.jabber.no/ejabberd-1.0.0.tar.bz2) (X over vesa fb). Is it planned to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X: unmasking tonight, RFC

2006-04-20 Thread Stephen P. Becker
Bertrand Jacquin wrote: On 4/19/06, Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bertrand Jacquin wrote: Is it planned to release some xserver ebuilds ? Could you rephrase the question? I don't understand it. I can't any ebuild for xserver (http://www.jabber.no/ejabberd-1.0.0.tar.bz2) (X over

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X: unmasking tonight, RFC

2006-04-19 Thread Bertrand Jacquin
On 3/23/06, Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, There aren't really any remaining blockers to keep modular X out of ~arch, as far as I can see. If anyone's got one, please bring it up now. I'm planning to unmask later tonight. Is it planned to release some xserver ebuilds ?

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X: unmasking tonight, RFC

2006-04-19 Thread Donnie Berkholz
Bertrand Jacquin wrote: Is it planned to release some xserver ebuilds ? Could you rephrase the question? I don't understand it. Thanks, Donnie -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X: unmasking tonight, RFC

2006-03-23 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
On Thursday 23 March 2006 06:38, Greg KH wrote: i know last time i upgraded, the evdev driver was broken to crap anyways ;) The evdev kernel driver, or evdev X driver? Talking about X driver I suppose... And I think I sort of know what's the big issue there... scancodes given by X are

[gentoo-dev] Modular X: unmasking tonight, RFC

2006-03-22 Thread Donnie Berkholz
Hi all, There aren't really any remaining blockers to keep modular X out of ~arch, as far as I can see. If anyone's got one, please bring it up now. I'm planning to unmask later tonight. Thanks, Donnie signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X: unmasking tonight, RFC

2006-03-22 Thread Olivier Crete
On Wed, 2006-22-03 at 15:16 -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote: Hi all, There aren't really any remaining blockers to keep modular X out of ~arch, as far as I can see. If anyone's got one, please bring it up now. I'm planning to unmask later tonight. If modular X is used and

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X: unmasking tonight, RFC

2006-03-22 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On Mar 22, 2006, at 4:13 PM, Olivier Crete wrote: If modular X is used and gnome-base/control-center is not patched.. gnome-settings-daemon on some evdev combinations... Not sure if that's a blocker... but we should rush in a new version of control-center with the patch Nah, not a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X: unmasking tonight, RFC

2006-03-22 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wednesday 22 March 2006 19:59, Donnie Berkholz wrote: On Mar 22, 2006, at 4:13 PM, Olivier Crete wrote: If modular X is used and gnome-base/control-center is not patched.. gnome-settings-daemon on some evdev combinations... Not sure if that's a blocker... but we should rush in a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X: unmasking tonight, RFC

2006-03-22 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 08:20:01PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Wednesday 22 March 2006 19:59, Donnie Berkholz wrote: On Mar 22, 2006, at 4:13 PM, Olivier Crete wrote: If modular X is used and gnome-base/control-center is not patched.. gnome-settings-daemon on some evdev