Re: [gentoo-dev] Monolithic X unsupported

2006-09-10 Thread Steev Klimaszewski
Stephen P. Becker wrote: > Steev Klimaszewski wrote: >> Donnie Berkholz wrote: >>> Mike Frysinger wrote: how about a local USE flag like "all-the-junk-in-the-trunk" ? >>> Why? Just makes more work for us, for no apparent reason. I'd rather be >>> able to pull unused stuff from the tree after a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monolithic X unsupported

2006-09-10 Thread Stephen P. Becker
Steev Klimaszewski wrote: Donnie Berkholz wrote: Mike Frysinger wrote: how about a local USE flag like "all-the-junk-in-the-trunk" ? Why? Just makes more work for us, for no apparent reason. I'd rather be able to pull unused stuff from the tree after a while than add a new option to install st

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monolithic X unsupported

2006-09-10 Thread Steev Klimaszewski
Donnie Berkholz wrote: > Mike Frysinger wrote: >> how about a local USE flag like "all-the-junk-in-the-trunk" ? > > Why? Just makes more work for us, for no apparent reason. I'd rather be > able to pull unused stuff from the tree after a while than add a new > option to install stuff nobody will e

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monolithic X unsupported

2006-09-09 Thread Donnie Berkholz
Mike Frysinger wrote: > how about a local USE flag like "all-the-junk-in-the-trunk" ? Why? Just makes more work for us, for no apparent reason. I'd rather be able to pull unused stuff from the tree after a while than add a new option to install stuff nobody will ever run. Thanks, Donnie signat

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monolithic X unsupported

2006-09-09 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Saturday 09 September 2006 22:46, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > so we're clear (cause i might have just missed it on irc) but there will > > be a "meta monolithic" ebuild right ? one that has all the same deps as > > what the current monolithic provides ? > > Not planning o

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monolithic X unsupported

2006-09-09 Thread Donnie Berkholz
Mike Frysinger wrote: > so we're clear (cause i might have just missed it on irc) but there will be > a "meta monolithic" ebuild right ? one that has all the same deps as what > the current monolithic provides ? Not planning on it. There will be the xorg-x11 metabuild that provides a recommende

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monolithic X unsupported

2006-09-09 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Saturday 09 September 2006 20:10, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > This is a formal notice that monolithic X is no longer supported. awesome ! > Developers with X-dependent packages may pull the || virtual/x11 section > and retain just the modular dep list. Monolithic X will receive no > further secur

[gentoo-dev] Monolithic X unsupported

2006-09-09 Thread Donnie Berkholz
Hi all, This is a formal notice that monolithic X is no longer supported. Developers with X-dependent packages may pull the || virtual/x11 section and retain just the modular dep list. Monolithic X will receive no further security updates, and is currently subject to at least one local security vu