Hello,
There are some packages which were 'readded' to the Sunrise overlay
after lying unmaintained in the tree for a long time and finally being
removed. One example could be net-im/ekg2 for removal of which I've been
personally waiting.
Although such a workflow 'works' indeed, for most of the
On 06/13/2010 10:41 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
Wouldn't it be better to officially support moving unmaintained
packages directly into Sunrise? In this case by 'unmaintained' I mean
those which have open bugs assigned to 'maintainer-needed' for a long
time, and are potentially a candidates for the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 13-06-2010 08:41, Michał Górny wrote:
Hello,
There are some packages which were 'readded' to the Sunrise overlay
after lying unmaintained in the tree for a long time and finally being
removed. One example could be net-im/ekg2 for removal of
On 06/13/2010 05:26 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
Wouldn't it be better to officially support moving unmaintained
packages directly into Sunrise? In this case by 'unmaintained' I mean
those which have open bugs assigned to 'maintainer-needed' for a long
time, and are potentially a
On 06/13/10 16:26, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
If we want to find a way to not drop the maintainer-needed packages, I'd
prefer we move them to sunset and not to sunrise.
Agreed.
If there is a user-maintainer move to sunrise, if there isn't move to
sunset.
As this overlay is
likely to
