Re: [gentoo-dev] New QA Policy Guide

2020-01-19 Thread William Hubbs
On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 12:31:52PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > Hello, > > In the light of the recent misunderstandings, I have started working > on an official Policy Guide [1]. The Guide is meant to provide > a focused list of officially approved QA policies, along with their > rationale and

Re: [gentoo-dev] New QA Policy Guide

2020-01-19 Thread Michał Górny
On Sun, 2020-01-19 at 19:34 +, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 12:31:52PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > > Hello, > > > > In the light of the recent misunderstandings, I have started working > > on an official Policy Guide [1]. The Guide is meant to provide > > a focused list

Re: [gentoo-dev] New QA Policy Guide

2020-01-19 Thread Michał Górny
On Sun, 2020-01-19 at 19:44 +0100, Haelwenn (lanodan) Monnier wrote: > Thanks a lot for this policy guide, finally there is a good documentation > on them. > > I found one issue with it though, on pages like other-metadata.html and > keywords.html the links are too large and squish the dt

Re: [gentoo-dev] New QA Policy Guide

2020-01-19 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 2:32 PM Kent Fredric wrote: > > Having a discussion at a bar, and you making a commit as a result is > one thing, but if I discovered a bug, and then only told you about it > at the bar, that would be possibly bad, because there's no guarantee > that the bug is

Re: [gentoo-dev] New QA Policy Guide

2020-01-19 Thread Michał Górny
On Sun, 2020-01-19 at 19:34 +, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 12:31:52PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > > Hello, > > > > In the light of the recent misunderstandings, I have started working > > on an official Policy Guide [1]. The Guide is meant to provide > > a focused list

Re: [gentoo-dev] New QA Policy Guide

2020-01-19 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 12:31:52PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > Hello, > > In the light of the recent misunderstandings, I have started working > on an official Policy Guide [1]. The Guide is meant to provide > a focused list of officially approved QA policies, along with their > rationale and

Re: [gentoo-dev] New QA Policy Guide

2020-01-19 Thread Kent Fredric
On Sun, 19 Jan 2020 13:54:33 -0500 Rich Freeman wrote: > Nothing of importance should be stored on github. > > If you and I have a conversation at a bar, and as a result you decide > to make a commit without any useful comments, and then we both retire > from the project, just as much

Re: [gentoo-dev] New QA Policy Guide

2020-01-19 Thread Michał Górny
On Sun, 2020-01-19 at 19:44 +0100, Haelwenn (lanodan) Monnier wrote: > Thanks a lot for this policy guide, finally there is a good documentation > on them. > > I found one issue with it though, on pages like other-metadata.html and > keywords.html the links are too large and squish the dt

Re: [gentoo-dev] New QA Policy Guide

2020-01-19 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 1:45 PM Kent Fredric wrote: > > On Sun, 19 Jan 2020 07:08:30 -0500 > Rich Freeman wrote: > > > The official sources aren't in github. A bugzilla component is > > available, so if github goes away there is no problem and we aren't > > relying on it. > > If github goes

Re: [gentoo-dev] New QA Policy Guide

2020-01-19 Thread Kent Fredric
On Sun, 19 Jan 2020 12:31:52 +0100 Michał Górny wrote: > Enjoy! Many thanks for making this happen. pgpkU6bOR1NU6.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] New QA Policy Guide

2020-01-19 Thread Kent Fredric
On Sun, 19 Jan 2020 07:08:30 -0500 Rich Freeman wrote: > The official sources aren't in github. A bugzilla component is > available, so if github goes away there is no problem and we aren't > relying on it. If github goes away after bugs and PR's are filed on github, then that historical

Re: [gentoo-dev] New QA Policy Guide

2020-01-19 Thread Haelwenn (lanodan) Monnier
Thanks a lot for this policy guide, finally there is a good documentation on them. I found one issue with it though, on pages like other-metadata.html and keywords.html the links are too large and squish the dt elements, one way I found to fix it is by adding `word-break: break-all` to

Re: [gentoo-dev] New QA Policy Guide

2020-01-19 Thread Michał Górny
On Sun, 2020-01-19 at 18:50 +0100, Thomas Deutschmann wrote: > On 2020-01-19 12:46, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > > > > > On Sun, 19 Jan 2020, Michał Górny wrote: > > > The sources are stored in proj/policy-guide.git [3]. If you wish to > > > submit your own changes, you can either use the 'Policy

Re: [gentoo-dev] New QA Policy Guide

2020-01-19 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
On 2020-01-19 12:46, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> On Sun, 19 Jan 2020, Michał Górny wrote: > >> The sources are stored in proj/policy-guide.git [3]. If you wish to >> submit your own changes, you can either use the 'Policy Guide' bugzilla >> component [4] and/or GitHub mirror [5]. > > Please,

Re: [gentoo-dev] New QA Policy Guide

2020-01-19 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 6:46 AM Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > On Sun, 19 Jan 2020, Michał Górny wrote: > > > The sources are stored in proj/policy-guide.git [3]. If you wish to > > submit your own changes, you can either use the 'Policy Guide' bugzilla > > component [4] and/or GitHub mirror

Re: [gentoo-dev] New QA Policy Guide

2020-01-19 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Sun, 19 Jan 2020, Michał Górny wrote: > The sources are stored in proj/policy-guide.git [3]. If you wish to > submit your own changes, you can either use the 'Policy Guide' bugzilla > component [4] and/or GitHub mirror [5]. Please, no github for official policies. We should have a

[gentoo-dev] New QA Policy Guide

2020-01-19 Thread Michał Górny
Hello, In the light of the recent misunderstandings, I have started working on an official Policy Guide [1]. The Guide is meant to provide a focused list of officially approved QA policies, along with their rationale and any other useful information. This should supplement devmanual [2] with