> On Mon, 05 Oct 2020, Aaron W Swenson wrote:
> On 2020-10-05 10:51, Aaron W. Swenson wrote:
>> Currently we're just using -1 for pgbouncer. The user does own a
>> couple things, but that's managed by checkpath in the init script.
>>
>> So, given that any UID will do, I'm proposing either
On 2020-10-05 10:51, Aaron W. Swenson wrote:
> Currently we're just using -1 for pgbouncer. The user does own a couple
> things,
> but that's managed by checkpath in the init script.
>
> So, given that any UID will do, I'm proposing either 383 (I think someone
> else
> is asking for 384) or
Currently we're just using -1 for pgbouncer. The user does own a couple things,
but that's managed by checkpath in the init script.
So, given that any UID will do, I'm proposing either 383 (I think someone else
is asking for 384) or 463.
Pgbouncer only needs a UID. It uses the postgres GID.
