On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 05:48 +0100, Elfyn McBratney wrote:
I've filed a bug[1] requesting that ebuilds with updated apache stuff
(anything using the new apache-module or depend.apache eclass/the new install
layout) be package.mask'd due to the regressions and breakages in testing. I
may
On Thursday 21 Apr 2005 12:37, Paul Varner wrote:
On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 05:48 +0100, Elfyn McBratney wrote:
I've filed a bug[1] requesting that ebuilds with updated apache stuff
(anything using the new apache-module or depend.apache eclass/the new
install layout) be package.mask'd due to
On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 12:43:21PM +0100, Elfyn McBratney wrote:
Seems, I've been speaking to the wrong people then. Anyways, this has
prompted loads of bugs being fixed, which might mean apache will go stable
instead.
Could you please see about a definitive list of bugs that are solely
due
[Cc'd -core in case some devs read that more]
Hi folks,
I've filed a bug[1] requesting that ebuilds with updated apache stuff
(anything using the new apache-module or depend.apache eclass/the new install
layout) be package.mask'd due to the regressions and breakages in testing. I
may have
