On 20:26 Wed 06 Oct , Michał Górny wrote:
On Wed, 6 Oct 2010 12:52:33 -0500
Donnie Berkholz dberkh...@gentoo.org wrote:
local flag=${1}
local varname=${2:-${flag#!}}
Could you explain how this works to me, please? It seems like you're
reversing the logic when people use
On Thu, 7 Oct 2010 22:08:30 -0500
Donnie Berkholz dberkh...@gentoo.org wrote:
So what happens if I want the !use syntax and say `use_scons !ssl
nossl`?
${2} is set then, and ${flag#!} isn't even evaluated.
BTW I've changed that already to make $(use_scons !ssl) output nossl.
This should be
On 20:57 Tue 05 Oct , Michał Górny wrote:
# @FUNCTION: use_scons
# @USAGE: use-flag [var-name] [var-opt-true] [var-opt-false]
# @DESCRIPTION:
# Output an SCons parameter with value depending on the USE flag state.
# If the USE flag is set, output var-name=var-opt-true; otherwise
#
On Wed, 6 Oct 2010 12:52:33 -0500
Donnie Berkholz dberkh...@gentoo.org wrote:
local flag=${1}
local varname=${2:-${flag#!}}
Could you explain how this works to me, please? It seems like you're
reversing the logic when people use the !flag syntax.
It's just the variable (macro)
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 19:27:22 -0400
Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
then keep it simple and separate:
escons() {
debug-print-function ${FUNCNAME} $...@}
set -- scons $(scons_clean_makeopts) ${SCONSOPTS}
${EXTRA_ESCONS} $...@} echo $...@} 2
$...@}
}
now you
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 19:36:50 +0200
Maciej Mrozowski reave...@gmail.com wrote:
If SCons is unpredictable, then don't provide *any* phases and only
functions and rename it to scons-utils to match its purpose.
It is as predictable as the buildsystem meeting the default phase
functions
On Tuesday 24 of August 2010 10:30:12 Michał Górny wrote:
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 19:36:50 +0200
Maciej Mrozowski reave...@gmail.com wrote:
If SCons is unpredictable, then don't provide *any* phases and only
functions and rename it to scons-utils to match its purpose.
It is as predictable
r4, ChangeLog:
3e30e1f Rename to scons-utils.eclass.
6477004 Remove exported phase functions.
41784fc Implement a cache in scons_clean_makeopts().
9b3ce5d Clarify doc on SCONSOPTS.
ac9f7ed Call scons_clean_makeopts() inline instead of exporting
SCONSOPTS.
ae6afd9 Fix SCONSOPTS check in
On Tuesday, August 24, 2010 14:40:56 Michał Górny wrote:
3e30e1f Rename to scons-utils.eclass.
funny, i thought scons.eclass was appropriate. but whatever.
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 17:30:32 -0400
Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tuesday, August 24, 2010 14:40:56 Michał Górny wrote:
3e30e1f Rename to scons-utils.eclass.
funny, i thought scons.eclass was appropriate. but whatever.
Maciej complained about not exporting all ever possible
On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 20:39:23 +0200
Michał Górny gen...@mgorny.alt.pl wrote:
The third revision, almost all suggestions applied. The ChangeLog:
151ddf2 Support passing a flag list to scons_clean_makeopts().
82a3ee7 Output the resulting flag list in scons_clean_makeopts()
instead of
On Monday, August 23, 2010 12:24:54 Michał Górny wrote:
The third revision, almost all suggestions applied. The ChangeLog:
if there are suggestions you've actively ignored, those should be noted
44188e0 escons(): set SCONSOPTS implicitly if they are unset.
ccf1ef9 Introduce SCONSOPTS and use
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 12:39:50 -0400
Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Monday, August 23, 2010 12:24:54 Michał Górny wrote:
The third revision, almost all suggestions applied. The ChangeLog:
if there are suggestions you've actively ignored, those should be
noted
I've replied to the
On Monday, August 23, 2010 13:16:38 Michał Górny wrote:
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 12:39:50 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
i'm not sure caching the value and using it in between runs is a good
idea. unless you also cache the thing you're caching and compare it
to make sure your cache is no longer
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 16:22:35 -0400
Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Monday, August 23, 2010 13:16:38 Michał Górny wrote:
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 12:39:50 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
i'm not sure caching the value and using it in between runs is a
good idea. unless you also cache
On Monday, August 23, 2010 19:02:21 Michał Górny wrote:
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 16:22:35 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday, August 23, 2010 13:16:38 Michał Górny wrote:
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 12:39:50 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
i'm not sure caching the value and using it in between runs is
Hello,
As per bug #333911, I'm working on a new eclass, providing some basic
functions common to most of the ebuilds using the SCons build system.
The basic reason for the new eclass is that a growing number of ebuilds
is calling SCons directly, and reimplementing the same ideas. This is
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 12:04:52PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
Hello,
As per bug #333911, I'm working on a new eclass, providing some basic
functions common to most of the ebuilds using the SCons build system.
[...]
I'm attaching the eclass draft (the same which is attached to bug
2010/8/22 Michał Górny gen...@mgorny.alt.pl:
src_compile() {
scons \
$(scons-use unicode) \
$(scons-use gnutls ssl gnutls openssl) \
${MAKEOPTS} || die
# expands into:
# scons unicode={1|0} ssl={gnutls|openssl} -jN || die
}
On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 13:26:18 +0300
Alex Alexander wi...@gentoo.org wrote:
You could avoid having to define pkg_setup in every ebuild by
defining a default one in your eclass:
Yeah, I am considering that. I am considering adding a default
src_compile() too.
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 12:03:10 +0100
David Leverton levert...@googlemail.com wrote:
2010/8/22 Michał Górny gen...@mgorny.alt.pl:
src_compile() {
scons \
$(scons-use unicode) \
$(scons-use gnutls ssl gnutls openssl) \
${MAKEOPTS} || die
21 matches
Mail list logo
