Am Friday 22 October 2010 schrieb Thomas Kahle:
> The nauty license *does* restrict the cost of redistribution. So what
> is it? An EULA?
Then it's probably just "nothing" according to our icense-groups. We don't
have any need to have every license in any license-group.
EULA is for licenses whe
Hi,
On 02:33 Fri 22 Oct , Hanno Böck wrote:
> > We're good to have it in MISC-FREE ourselves, as redistribution and
> > everything else is free.
>
> Erh, no. MISC-FREE is for free and open source software and is more or less
> the same as Debians free software guideline. That's the whole pur
Am Friday 22 October 2010 schrieb Robin H. Johnson:
> It's DFSG non-free because it contains a restriction on use (that
> military item) and sale.
>
> We're good to have it in MISC-FREE ourselves, as redistribution and
> everything else is free.
Erh, no. MISC-FREE is for free and open source soft
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 09:50:08PM +0200, Thomas Kahle wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to add the following license to the tree. It is the license of
> sci-mathematics/nauty, currently living in the science overlay. Debian
> ships it as part of the non-free set:
> http://packages.debian.org/unstable/mat
Hi,
I want to add the following license to the tree. It is the license of
sci-mathematics/nauty, currently living in the science overlay. Debian
ships it as part of the non-free set:
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/math/nauty
Any objections, comments, questions ?
-
