On Saturday 22 August 2009 10:19:00 Samuli Suominen wrote:
> Mounir Lamouri wrote:
> >> No. I only want the .so.62 for binary apps, thus the ebuild won't
> >> install anything but the shared libs
> >
> > You wrote a header was now private so it will probably make a lot of
> > ebuilds incompatible w
Mounir Lamouri wrote:
>> No. I only want the .so.62 for binary apps, thus the ebuild won't
>> install anything but the shared libs
> You wrote a header was now private so it will probably make a lot of
> ebuilds incompatible with 7.0. Maybe slotting could be useful even for them.
No.
The include
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 16:01:47 +0300
>> Samuli Suominen wrote:
>>
>>> media-libs/jpeg-7 installs .so.7.0.0 so this causes some headacke for
>>> binary applications:
>>>
>> Doesn't this mean you should slot it?
>>
> No. I only w
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 16:01:47 +0300
> Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> media-libs/jpeg-7 installs .so.7.0.0 so this causes some headacke for
>> binary applications:
>
> Doesn't this mean you should slot it?
>
No. I only want the .so.62 for binary apps, thus the ebuild won't
ins
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 16:01:47 +0300
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> media-libs/jpeg-7 installs .so.7.0.0 so this causes some headacke for
> binary applications:
Doesn't this mean you should slot it?
--
Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> This means you have change deps to || ( media-libs/jpeg-compat
> <=media-libs/jpeg-7 ) for example. Feel free to use suitable alternative
> syntaxes.
Typo. Correct:
|| ( media-libs/jpeg-compat
media-libs/jpeg-7 installs .so.7.0.0 so this causes some headacke for
binary applications:
media-libs/jpeg-compat-6b will install libjpeg.so.62{,.0.0} for use with
binary applications, let me know if there is a trouble with the package.
This means you have change deps to || ( media-libs/jpeg-comp
