[gentoo-dev] New media-libs/jpeg-7 and how to deal with it.
media-libs/jpeg-7 installs .so.7.0.0 so this causes some headacke for
binary applications:
media-libs/jpeg-compat-6b will install libjpeg.so.62{,.0.0} for use with
binary applications, let me know if there is a trouble with the package.
This means you have change deps to || ( media-libs/jpeg-compat
=media-libs/jpeg-7 ) for example. Feel free to use suitable alternative
syntaxes.
Otherwise it just means a long @preserved-rebuild emerge.
jpegint.h isn't installed anymore (private header), if this is causing
trouble for you let me know about that too...
Thanks, Samuli
Re: [gentoo-dev] New media-libs/jpeg-7 and how to deal with it.
Samuli Suominen wrote: This means you have change deps to || ( media-libs/jpeg-compat =media-libs/jpeg-7 ) for example. Feel free to use suitable alternative syntaxes. Typo. Correct: || ( media-libs/jpeg-compat media-libs/jpeg-7 )
Re: [gentoo-dev] New media-libs/jpeg-7 and how to deal with it.
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 16:01:47 +0300 Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote: media-libs/jpeg-7 installs .so.7.0.0 so this causes some headacke for binary applications: Doesn't this mean you should slot it? -- Ciaran McCreesh signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] New media-libs/jpeg-7 and how to deal with it.
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 16:01:47 +0300 Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote: media-libs/jpeg-7 installs .so.7.0.0 so this causes some headacke for binary applications: Doesn't this mean you should slot it? No. I only want the .so.62 for binary apps, thus the ebuild won't install anything but the shared libs.
Re: [gentoo-dev] New media-libs/jpeg-7 and how to deal with it.
Samuli Suominen wrote: Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 16:01:47 +0300 Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote: media-libs/jpeg-7 installs .so.7.0.0 so this causes some headacke for binary applications: Doesn't this mean you should slot it? No. I only want the .so.62 for binary apps, thus the ebuild won't install anything but the shared libs You wrote a header was now private so it will probably make a lot of ebuilds incompatible with 7.0. Maybe slotting could be useful even for them. Mounir
Re: [gentoo-dev] New media-libs/jpeg-7 and how to deal with it.
Mounir Lamouri wrote: No. I only want the .so.62 for binary apps, thus the ebuild won't install anything but the shared libs You wrote a header was now private so it will probably make a lot of ebuilds incompatible with 7.0. Maybe slotting could be useful even for them. No. The include was always private but we patched 6b to install it for a ancient bug involving media-gfx/feh.
Re: [gentoo-dev] New media-libs/jpeg-7 and how to deal with it.
On Saturday 22 August 2009 10:19:00 Samuli Suominen wrote: Mounir Lamouri wrote: No. I only want the .so.62 for binary apps, thus the ebuild won't install anything but the shared libs You wrote a header was now private so it will probably make a lot of ebuilds incompatible with 7.0. Maybe slotting could be useful even for them. No. The include was always private but we patched 6b to install it for a ancient bug involving media-gfx/feh. sounds correct to me. ABI change only - no SLOT. -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
