Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Steve Dibb wrote:
>
>> I had an idea for some new fields to go in metadata.xml. Not sure if we
>> would need a GLEP for this or not? Anyway, what do you guys think:
>>
>> Two things I can think of adding that would be useful:
>>
>> - Chang
The equery 'meta' module in gentoolkit-0.3.0* can show all the
upstream fields, though not many packages currently make use of it.
Oh yeah, and there's a traceback in the upstream code that's been
fixed but won't be in the tree until rc7, so you may want to wait to
check it out.
$ equery m --upst
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Steve Dibb wrote:
> I had an idea for some new fields to go in metadata.xml. Not sure if we
> would need a GLEP for this or not? Anyway, what do you guys think:
>
> Two things I can think of adding that would be useful:
>
> - ChangeLog URL
> - Bug Tracker
>
> I kn
Dne středa 03 Červen 2009 16:38:28 Steve Dibb napsal(a):
> I had an idea for some new fields to go in metadata.xml. Not sure if we
> would need a GLEP for this or not? Anyway, what do you guys think:
>
> Two things I can think of adding that would be useful:
>
> - ChangeLog URL
> - Bug Tracker
>
I had an idea for some new fields to go in metadata.xml. Not sure if we
would need a GLEP for this or not? Anyway, what do you guys think:
Two things I can think of adding that would be useful:
- ChangeLog URL
- Bug Tracker
I know I hate hunting down the two of them, and both of them could b
