On Fri, 5 Sep 2008 17:24:57 +0200
Marius Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- another idea that hasn't been mentioned yet is that we could simply
inject @system into world_sets in the portage ebuild when we detect a
2.1-2.2 upgrade (the ebuild already does a few other migrations that
way). That
On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 22:39:41 +0300
Petteri Räty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As per glep 42 (http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0042.html)
here is the required email for a new news item. This news item is
important because otherwise users will be missing updates to the
system set if they
Marius Mauch wrote:
First, regarding the news item, I'd suggest that instead of telling
users to modify world_sets manually to use `emerge --noreplace @system`.
++
Second for the suggestions on how to handle the transition:
- treating 'world' and '@world' differently is a no go from my POV.
As per glep 42 (http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0042.html) here
is the required email for a new news item. This news item is important
because otherwise users will be missing updates to the system set if
they continue updating their system with the usual emerge --update
--deep world.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 10:39:41PM +0300, Petteri R??ty wrote:
Title: World file handling changes in Portage-2.2
Author: Petteri R??ty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Author: Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain
Posted: 2008-XX-XX
Revision: 1
2008-08-17 03:46:11 William Hubbs napisał(a):
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 10:39:41PM +0300, Petteri R??ty wrote:
Title: World file handling changes in Portage-2.2
Author: Petteri R??ty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Author: Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain
Posted: 2008-XX-XX
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
William Hubbs wrote:
As of Portage 2.2 the world set does not include the system
set any more. If you want emerge --update --deep @world to
update the system set too, you need to add @system to the new
world_sets file in /var/lib/portage/. For
