Re: [gentoo-dev] Nominations Update

2007-08-05 Thread Tobias Scherbaum
Heya, Christina Fullam write: Most who have accepted havent told us why we should vote for them. While that information is not required perhaps it should be if we are to make intelligent votes - sorry this isnt a popularity contest so give us some content to review. I put my little manifesto

Re: [gentoo-dev] Nominations Update

2007-07-31 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 17:38:16 -0700 Christina Fullam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1) What you will do 2) Why you will do it 3) How you will do it 4) What is the timescale for doing it 5) What experience do you have with this or a similar role 6) Why do you think you are qualified 7) How you plan

Re: [gentoo-dev] Nominations Update

2007-07-31 Thread Wernfried Haas
Those who have accepted though havent sent information regarding why we should vote for them: Since it's almost time to vote, here's a collection of my thoughts about the council: http://dev.gentoo.org/~amne/stuff/councilnomination.txt If something is unclear or you have further questions,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Nominations Update

2007-07-25 Thread Peter Weller
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 17:38:16 -0700 Christina Fullam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Although I've mentioned quite a bit, I feel that some of these questions still need addressing... This lot can probably be added to my candidate info stuffs/platform thingie on the site... [..snip..] 1) What you will

Re: [gentoo-dev] Nominations Update

2007-07-24 Thread Roy Marples
On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 17:38 -0700, Christina Fullam wrote: Just a reminder about nominations and voting... If anyone is still interested in running, you have one week left for nominations. Most who have accepted havent told us why we should vote for them. While that information is not

Re: [gentoo-dev] Nominations Update

2007-07-24 Thread Wulf C. Krueger
Hello Roy! I've said my piece. You'll vote for me if you agree with my technical decisions and you find yourself siding with me (even mentally) in the few discussions I take part in on -dev and #-dev. I can't say much about your technical decisions because I haven't consciously seen any, I

Re: [gentoo-dev] Nominations Update

2007-07-24 Thread Roy Marples
On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 14:25 +0200, Wulf C. Krueger wrote: I can't say much about your technical decisions because I haven't consciously seen any, I rarely see you take part in any discussions. Maybe that's because -dev wasn't a forum for technical discussion. Hopefully that might change. So

Re: [gentoo-dev] Nominations Update

2007-07-24 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 14:25:56 +0200 Wulf C. Krueger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've said my piece. You'll vote for me if you agree with my technical decisions and you find yourself siding with me (even mentally) in the few discussions I take part in on -dev and #-dev. I can't say much about

Re: [gentoo-dev] Nominations Update

2007-07-24 Thread Luca Barbato
Yesterday night I tried to reply but I was too tired... Christina Fullam wrote: Just a reminder about nominations and voting... If anyone is still interested in running, you have one week left for nominations. Most who have accepted havent told us why we should vote for them. While that

[gentoo-dev] Nominations Update

2007-07-23 Thread Christina Fullam
Just a reminder about nominations and voting... If anyone is still interested in running, you have one week left for nominations. Most who have accepted havent told us why we should vote for them. While that information is not required perhaps it should be if we are to make intelligent votes -