Re: [gentoo-dev] Non-maintainer commits and CI

2021-03-01 Thread Sam James
> On 7 Jan 2021, at 14:28, Agostino Sarubbo wrote: > > Hello, > > it happens frequently that CI discovers failure(s) in non-maintainer commits. > > The most striking examples are maintainer-needed, proxy-maint and general pull > request where who made the change has no visibility on the new

Re: [gentoo-dev] Non-maintainer commits and CI

2021-01-07 Thread Joonas Niilola
On 1/7/21 4:28 PM, Agostino Sarubbo wrote: > Hello, > > it happens frequently that CI discovers failure(s) in non-maintainer commits. > > The most striking examples are maintainer-needed, proxy-maint and general > pull > request where who made the change has no visibility on the new bug. > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Non-maintainer commits and CI

2021-01-07 Thread Sam James
> On 7 Jan 2021, at 14:28, Agostino Sarubbo wrote: > > Hello, > > it happens frequently that CI discovers failure(s) in non-maintainer commits. > > The most striking examples are maintainer-needed, proxy-maint and general pull > request where who made the change has no visibility on the new

[gentoo-dev] Non-maintainer commits and CI

2021-01-07 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
Hello, it happens frequently that CI discovers failure(s) in non-maintainer commits. The most striking examples are maintainer-needed, proxy-maint and general pull request where who made the change has no visibility on the new bug. Do you think that is a good idea to CC everyone involved in