Re: [gentoo-dev] Ohloh statistics updated
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 10:33 PM, Raúl Porcel wrote: > On 07/22/2011 03:11 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: >> Hello fellow devs, >> [snip] > > Yey i'm number two :D > You're a bot, you don't count. ;) -- ~Nirbheek Chauhan Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team
Re: [gentoo-dev] Ohloh statistics updated
On 07/22/2011 03:11 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: > Hello fellow devs, > [snip] Yey i'm number two :D
Re: [gentoo-dev] Ohloh statistics updated
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote: >> [1] https://www.ohloh.net/p/gentoo >> [2] >> http://git-exp.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=exp/gentoo-x86.git;a=summary > > It appears they count rather more commits than does CIA - Manifest > commits look to be the likely cause. > > Each user can setup an ignore list from the ohloh interface. don't know if there's a way to ignore files project-side. Regards, -- Rafael Goncalves Martins Gentoo Linux developer http://rafaelmartins.eng.br/
Re: [gentoo-dev] Ohloh statistics updated
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:04:27 -0700 Zac Medico wrote: > On 07/25/2011 12:59 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Jeroen Roovers > > wrote: > >> On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:11:43 +0200 > >> Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: > >> > >>> So go claim your commits, > >> > >> Great work! > >> > >>> [1] https://www.ohloh.net/p/gentoo > >>> [2] > >>> http://git-exp.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=exp/gentoo-x86.git;a=summary > >> > >> It appears they count rather more commits than does CIA - Manifest > >> commits look to be the likely cause. > >> > > > > Another reason for all of us to move to gpg signed manifests — > > another commit free with every ebuild commit! > > Well, even without the signing step, the Manifest has to be committed > separately because the cvs $Header thing causes the ebuild digest to > change as soon as it is committed. But signing quite often implies typing in password, especially if it's the first signature done in the session. That means more delay, and thus more likely for the commit to be taken as a separate one. -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Ohloh statistics updated
On 07/25/2011 12:59 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote: >> On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:11:43 +0200 >> Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: >> >>> So go claim your commits, >> >> Great work! >> >>> [1] https://www.ohloh.net/p/gentoo >>> [2] >>> http://git-exp.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=exp/gentoo-x86.git;a=summary >> >> It appears they count rather more commits than does CIA - Manifest >> commits look to be the likely cause. >> > > Another reason for all of us to move to gpg signed manifests — another > commit free with every ebuild commit! Well, even without the signing step, the Manifest has to be committed separately because the cvs $Header thing causes the ebuild digest to change as soon as it is committed. -- Thanks, Zac
Re: [gentoo-dev] Ohloh statistics updated
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 01:29:01 +0530 Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Jeroen Roovers > wrote: > > On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:11:43 +0200 > > Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: > > > >> So go claim your commits, > > > > Great work! > > > >> [1] https://www.ohloh.net/p/gentoo > >> [2] > >> http://git-exp.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=exp/gentoo-x86.git;a=summary > > > > It appears they count rather more commits than does CIA - Manifest > > commits look to be the likely cause. > > > > Another reason for all of us to move to gpg signed manifests — another > commit free with every ebuild commit! The Manifest commit is done anyway, whether your GPG signature is added or not. jer
Re: [gentoo-dev] Ohloh statistics updated
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:11:43 +0200 > Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: > >> So go claim your commits, > > Great work! > >> [1] https://www.ohloh.net/p/gentoo >> [2] >> http://git-exp.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=exp/gentoo-x86.git;a=summary > > It appears they count rather more commits than does CIA - Manifest > commits look to be the likely cause. > Another reason for all of us to move to gpg signed manifests — another commit free with every ebuild commit! -- ~Nirbheek Chauhan Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team
Re: [gentoo-dev] Ohloh statistics updated
On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:11:43 +0200 Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: > So go claim your commits, Great work! > [1] https://www.ohloh.net/p/gentoo > [2] > http://git-exp.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=exp/gentoo-x86.git;a=summary It appears they count rather more commits than does CIA - Manifest commits look to be the likely cause. jer
Re: [gentoo-dev] Ohloh statistics updated
2011/7/22 Stanislav Ochotnicky : > After 3 weeks of crunching (or was it more?) Ohloh machines finally spit > out updated statistics, removing few warnings from our project page > (such as "Decreasing year-over-year development activity""). Updates are > faster of course so our stats shouldn't be outdated anymore. > Awesome! More karma for you! I was waiting for this for a long time. :) -- ~Nirbheek Chauhan Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team
Re: [gentoo-dev] Ohloh statistics updated
2011/7/22 Stanislav Ochotnicky : > Hello fellow devs, > > some of you know that our commit statistics at Ohloh[1] have been > outdated because they were not able to process our huge CVS tree for > some reason :-) > > One way or the other I managed to reuse robbat2's previous work on > cvs->git conversion and keep our experimental conversion repository > up-to-date (I don't have cron job, but it's still completely automated). > > After 3 weeks of crunching (or was it more?) Ohloh machines finally spit > out updated statistics, removing few warnings from our project page > (such as "Decreasing year-over-year development activity""). Updates are > faster of course so our stats shouldn't be outdated anymore. > > So go claim your commits, Nice! Thanks for taking this up! -- Arun Raghavan http://arunraghavan.net/ (Ford_Prefect | Gentoo) & (arunsr | GNOME)
Re: [gentoo-dev] Ohloh statistics updated
2011/7/22 Stanislav Ochotnicky : > Hello fellow devs, > > some of you know that our commit statistics at Ohloh[1] have been > outdated because they were not able to process our huge CVS tree for > some reason :-) > > One way or the other I managed to reuse robbat2's previous work on > cvs->git conversion and keep our experimental conversion repository > up-to-date (I don't have cron job, but it's still completely automated). > > After 3 weeks of crunching (or was it more?) Ohloh machines finally spit > out updated statistics, removing few warnings from our project page > (such as "Decreasing year-over-year development activity""). Updates are > faster of course so our stats shouldn't be outdated anymore. > > So go claim your commits, > Good job! Thank you! > > [1] https://www.ohloh.net/p/gentoo > [2] http://git-exp.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=exp/gentoo-x86.git;a=summary > > -- > Stanislav Ochotnicky > > PGP: 7B087241 > jabber: stanis...@ochotnicky.com > -- Jesus Rivero (Neurogeek) Gentoo Developer
[gentoo-dev] Ohloh statistics updated
Hello fellow devs, some of you know that our commit statistics at Ohloh[1] have been outdated because they were not able to process our huge CVS tree for some reason :-) One way or the other I managed to reuse robbat2's previous work on cvs->git conversion and keep our experimental conversion repository up-to-date (I don't have cron job, but it's still completely automated). After 3 weeks of crunching (or was it more?) Ohloh machines finally spit out updated statistics, removing few warnings from our project page (such as "Decreasing year-over-year development activity""). Updates are faster of course so our stats shouldn't be outdated anymore. So go claim your commits, [1] https://www.ohloh.net/p/gentoo [2] http://git-exp.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=exp/gentoo-x86.git;a=summary -- Stanislav Ochotnicky PGP: 7B087241 jabber: stanis...@ochotnicky.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature
