Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages looking for proxy as ian no longer has commit access
On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 17:25 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote: On Thu, 24 Nov 2011, Pacho Ramos wrote: Due https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99016 ian doesn't have commit access and, then, his packages need a proxy maintainer: app-portage/autounmask app-portage/demerge I would volunteer to proxy maintain these packages, if Christian still wants to be maintainer for them (his last commit was in 2009). If not, proxy maintainership doesn't make much sense. Ulrich, If we decide to proxy maintain these two packages, go ahead and add tool-portage as the herd to back you up. Regards, Paul
[gentoo-dev] Packages looking for proxy as ian no longer has commit access
Due https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99016 ian doesn't have commit access and, then, his packages need a proxy maintainer: app-portage/autounmask app-portage/demerge Ian, if you want to completely remove yourself from maintaining any package, please told us so. Thanks for taking them signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages looking for proxy as ian no longer has commit access
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011, Pacho Ramos wrote: Due https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99016 ian doesn't have commit access and, then, his packages need a proxy maintainer: app-portage/autounmask app-portage/demerge I would volunteer to proxy maintain these packages, if Christian still wants to be maintainer for them (his last commit was in 2009). If not, proxy maintainership doesn't make much sense. Ulrich